2005
DOI: 10.1177/1350508405052757
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Writing Responsibly: Narrative Fiction and Organization Studies

Abstract: In this paper we reflect on the use of fictional source material and fictional formats in organization studies in order to explore issues of responsibility in the writing of research. We start by examining how research using fictional narrative methods has worked to radically destabilise distinctions between what is real and what is fictional. In relation to this we ask the question: if a research account can be regarded as fiction, what are the implications of this insight for the responsibilities of authors?… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
122
0
3

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 140 publications
(128 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
3
122
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Telling this story is a 'hegemonic act required for legitimation purposes' (Humphreys and Brown, 2002, p. 421). However, even though much research has been conducted to show how 'stories can serve as means to provide legitimacy for organizational changes that might otherwise have been considered illegitimate, irrational or unnecessary' (Rhodes and Brown, 2005a, p. 173), less attention has been paid to their implications for organizational ethics (for exceptions see Humphreys and Brown, 2008;Kornberger and Brown, 2007;Rhodes and Brown, 2005b). Whilst there is a well-established literature on organizational storytelling (see Boje, 2001;Czarniawska, 1997Czarniawska, , 2004Gabriel, 2000;Rhodes and Brown, 2005a) and its relation to organizational change (Doolin, 2003;Feldman, 1990;Brown and Humphreys, 2003;Skoldberg, 1994;Stevenson and Greenberg, 1998) and power (Humphreys and Brown, 2002;Clegg, 1993;Mumby, 1987;Smith and Keyton, 2001), the place of ethics has remained relatively unexamined.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Telling this story is a 'hegemonic act required for legitimation purposes' (Humphreys and Brown, 2002, p. 421). However, even though much research has been conducted to show how 'stories can serve as means to provide legitimacy for organizational changes that might otherwise have been considered illegitimate, irrational or unnecessary' (Rhodes and Brown, 2005a, p. 173), less attention has been paid to their implications for organizational ethics (for exceptions see Humphreys and Brown, 2008;Kornberger and Brown, 2007;Rhodes and Brown, 2005b). Whilst there is a well-established literature on organizational storytelling (see Boje, 2001;Czarniawska, 1997Czarniawska, , 2004Gabriel, 2000;Rhodes and Brown, 2005a) and its relation to organizational change (Doolin, 2003;Feldman, 1990;Brown and Humphreys, 2003;Skoldberg, 1994;Stevenson and Greenberg, 1998) and power (Humphreys and Brown, 2002;Clegg, 1993;Mumby, 1987;Smith and Keyton, 2001), the place of ethics has remained relatively unexamined.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, our use of the Jekyll and Hyde conceit (which some may think of as an absurdity) first stimulated, and then framed these reflections. Here, the radical (ab-)use of a novel we attempted, though it has resonances with some other uses of the literary in organization studies (Czarniawska, 2008;De Cock and Land, 2005;Land and Sliwa, 2009;Rhodes and Brown, 2005), was one inspired primarily by the encouragement given to autoethnographers to use novels, poems and other creative forms of writing (Denzin, 2003).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While using literary accounts as sources is not a mainstream method, it has been used fruitfully in organization studies (see Rhodes [24,25] for a review) and development studies [21,22]. CzarniawskaJoerges and de Monthoux [26] suggest that reading fiction is a means to better understand the -realities‖ of organizations as it incorporates subjective and emotional perspectives together with more rational and logically organized accounts often found in traditional academic writing.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%