1989
DOI: 10.2307/3587338
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Writing Required in Graduate Courses in Business Administration

Abstract: The increasing proportion of graduate students to undergraduate students in ESL academic preparation programs in the United States suggests that more information is needed about language use in graduate courses. This article reports on the characteristics of writing assignments found in syllabuses for graduate courses in business. First, the types of writing assignments and the vocabulary used to label those assignments are analyzed and discussed. Second, the use of prompts to guide the writing of the assignme… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The research studies that inform this approach include analysis of the rhetorical organization of technical writing (Selinker, Todd-Trimble, & Trimble, 1978;Weissberg, 1984), studies of student writing in content areas (Jenkins & Hinds, 1987;Seizer, 1983), and surveys of the content and tasks L2 students can expect to encounter in their academic careers (Bridgeman & Carlson, 1983;Canseco & Byrd, 1989;Horowitz, 1986b). While classroom methodology might take on some of the features of a writer-focused approach, such as prewriting tasks and the opportunity for revision, the main emphasis is on the instructor's determination of what academic content is most appropriate, in order to build whole courses or modules of reading and writing tasks around that content.…”
Section: Focus On Content 1986-mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The research studies that inform this approach include analysis of the rhetorical organization of technical writing (Selinker, Todd-Trimble, & Trimble, 1978;Weissberg, 1984), studies of student writing in content areas (Jenkins & Hinds, 1987;Seizer, 1983), and surveys of the content and tasks L2 students can expect to encounter in their academic careers (Bridgeman & Carlson, 1983;Canseco & Byrd, 1989;Horowitz, 1986b). While classroom methodology might take on some of the features of a writer-focused approach, such as prewriting tasks and the opportunity for revision, the main emphasis is on the instructor's determination of what academic content is most appropriate, in order to build whole courses or modules of reading and writing tasks around that content.…”
Section: Focus On Content 1986-mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Teachers must therefore act as cultural informants as well as surrogate audiences. They must investigate the requirements and expectations of academic assignments and then help their students analyze and understand U.S. academic assignments and readers (Canesco & Byrd, 1989;Horowitz, 1986;Reid, 1992;Smagorinsky & Smith, 1992). In my classes, we often examine actual academic assignments from across the curriculum, analyzing the parameters of the assignment, identifying the expectations of that academic reader/evaluator, and discussing strategies to meet those expectations.…”
Section: Appropriation and The Academic Audiencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…We determined these tasks from various sources including program evaluation reports (Burnaby, Cumming & Belfiore, 1986;Dionne, Cray, & Huot, 1988), end-of-term reports, student evaluations and, of course, needs analyses reports (Chase & Marshall-Smith, 1990;Martin & Sun, 1987). We also consulted published papers on the academic needs of learners in North America similar to our trainees (Canseco & Byrd, 1989;Horowitz, 1986;Johns, 1981;Ostler, 1980, to name a few). Finally, we took into account the intuitions of past and present teachers at the CCLC, whom we interviewed at various times during the CD period.…”
Section: Syuabus Designmentioning
confidence: 99%