“…Underlying my response is the importance of recognising the contribution made by all participants, students included, toward academic literacies development, understood as an ongoing project in which the public has a stake and for which it has a responsibility. The matter of granting public access to academic literacies is, from this perspective, not so much a matter of a public right to, or equality of distribution of, a known entity, but a matter of need-the need of the academy for the work students (and others) perform in sustaining and revising academic literacies and knowledge through their concrete labor, most often in the form of work with and on written language (Horner, 2017;Horner & Lu, 2014). While I do not see this perspective on academic literacies to be in conflict with Neculai's provocation, it seems to me to merit emphasis in countering a predominant view of higher education as something with which to 'gift' the public.…”