2016
DOI: 10.1007/s10648-016-9393-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Writing in the Secondary-Level Disciplines: a Systematic Review of Context, Cognition, and Content

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
30
0
4

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
3
30
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Modeled after the systematic review guidelines established by Torgerson (2007), the studies underwent a methodological quality evaluation at the full-text level. Our Methodological Quality Questionnaire (see the Appendix) was adapted from Miller, Scott, and McTigue (2018). We added the criterion of fidelity of implementation because it predicts reading intervention success (e.g., Fogarty et al, 2014).…”
Section: Methodological Quality Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Modeled after the systematic review guidelines established by Torgerson (2007), the studies underwent a methodological quality evaluation at the full-text level. Our Methodological Quality Questionnaire (see the Appendix) was adapted from Miller, Scott, and McTigue (2018). We added the criterion of fidelity of implementation because it predicts reading intervention success (e.g., Fogarty et al, 2014).…”
Section: Methodological Quality Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Across all grade levels, writing challenges students (Bangert-Drowns, Hurley, & Wilkinson, 2004;Miller, Scott, & McTigue, 2018;Yost & Vogel, 2012). Students typically enter elementary school with enthusiastic and mostly favorable views toward writing (Elbow, 2004;James, Jao, & Berninger, 2017).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They found in their meta-analysis of writing-to-learn interventions a positive effect of metacognitive prompts, suggesting that a metacognitive position of the learner contributes to learning in the disciplines. This view is supported by a recent review of Miller et al (2018). However, their focus is mainly on metacognitive strategies for content learning, for instance through learning to write journals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Moreover, from secondary education onwards, content-area knowledge becomes more advanced and the texts and tasks students are confronted with require specialized forms of knowledge, related to the specific disciplines. Becoming a proficient writer across genres and disciplines requires systematic and explicit instruction (Miller, Scott, & McTigue, 2018). In the Netherlands, recently more attention is given to reading and writing in different school subjects, both in policy and teaching practices.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%