Writing and pseudo‐writing from Internet‐based sources: implications for learning and assessment

Abstract

In recent years, plagiarism has been on the increase across the Western world. This article identifies Internet access as a contributory cause of this trend and addresses the implications of readily available Internet sources for the teaching and assessment of writing in schools. The basis for the article is a previous study showing a wide incidence of plagiarism in the Internet-based writing of students in three classes at upper secondary school level in Norway. I relate the students' choices to writing as a cognitive process and as a cultural practice. My basic assumption is that the students' writing is work. It is this work we have in mind when we relate writing to learning and when we assess students' skills on the basis of their written texts. Access to the Internet changes the premises for this work because writing can be replaced by 'pseudowriting'. 'Pseudo-writing' is a work reducing writing practice, which neither excludes nor coincides with what we traditionally associate with plagiarism in schools. The main point in this article is that when students have access to the Internet during essay writing, the result is unavoidably a product of both writing and pseudo-writing. Internet access thus leads to greater uncertainty about the role writing plays in student learning and makes it more difficult to take written assignments into account in assessing students' school results and effort.

Spacious Grammar: Agency and Intention in the Teaching of Research Writing

“…It is up to us as instructors to demonstrate and create a more spacious and creative sense of possible uptakes in both these directions. The question is, how much space do students recognize they have and what possibilities are they encouraged to explore as they orient themselves and their writing through these processes (Artemeva, 2005;Skaar, 2015).…”

Students' work with literary concepts in digitally rich L1 classrooms

“…One possible conclusion is that activities of gathering information show the tenacity of common and recurrent literacy activities in classrooms, such as copying text passages from the textbook when answering questions. In digitalized classrooms, relying on ready-made texts is at least tempting since, as noted by Skaar (2015), using text on the Internet as part of the writing allows students to control their workload and their engagement with the task. Finally, it is noteworthy that in the context of this lesson, the task is completed with a joint quiz, and our focus student may have interpreted the explanations more as standard quiz answers where the correctness of the answer is more central than the process of joint academic elaboration.…”

Representaciones sociales de estudiantes universitarios sobre el plagio en la escritura académica

“…Este hecho puede afectar directamente el proceso formativo, debido a que no se construyen los fundamentos conceptuales de la disciplina. Skaar (2015) se refiere a esta situación como un proceso de seudoescritura, pues, aunque hay un producto escrito, este no logra las características necesarias para llegar a la función epistémica.…”