Within the wealth of research on 'ability' in education, there is a missing perspective: the perspective of the child. Whilst 'ability' informed practices such as 'ability' grouping are commonplace in the UK, how these are experienced by the young child has previously received only limited attention in research. Using case study evidence, this article demonstrates that children's lived experiences of 'ability' are highly individual and shaped by a broader range of social, structural and pedagogic aspects of classroom life than previously thought. Implications are that a wide range of teaching choices can potentially affect a child's experience of 'ability' and that the impact of these are particularly profound for some children, shaping their perception of themselves and others. Children's perspectives therefore offer a challenge to the hegemonic discourse of 'ability' in education and the classroom practices upon which it is based.'ability' upon children in classrooms and therefore provide the missing piece in understanding 'ability' in schools.
'Ability' in Education'Ability' is an educational phenomenon that exists as a socially constructed, more palatable term for 'intelligence' (Stobart, 2014; Gillborn & Youdell, 2011) and is pervasive in education in the UK (Marks, 2016). It stems from what Collins (2003) terms 'ability profiling' where children are deemed to be functioning, or capable of learning, at a level somewhere along a linear continuum from low to high 'ability'.Academic positions about the nature of 'intelligence' or 'ability' are entrenched with social, political, ideological and religious beliefs (White, 2005;Deary, 2006) and have promoted 'intense and often bitter public debate' (Laosa, 1996, p155) due to being rooted in societal economic and class structures (Oakes, 2005). Practice in schools is influenced by institutionalised notions of 'ability' as fixed and hierarchical which reinforce and reproduce social inequalities (Brantlinger, 1990). This IQism (Gillborn & Youdell, 2001) is prevalent in UK education policy where labels such as 'more able' (DfE, 2012;Ofsted, , 2015, 'the most able' (DfE, 2018), 'bright' (Gibb, 2018 and 'high ability' (the Teachers' Standards for all teachers in England and Wales, DfE, 2011, p.12) are commonly used. Dorling (2010) suggests that international comparison measures within an increasingly globalised educational market (Ball, 2012), the 'datafication' of education (Roberts-Holmes & Bradbury, 2016) and significant economic pressures (Hamilton & O'Hara, 2011;Flint & Peim, 2012) create an educational environment in the UK where 'ability' thinking pervades and 'ability' informed practices flourish.In this sense, schools fit and support the existing social order (Oakes and Guiton, 1995).For educators and policy makers, the notion of 'ability' or 'intelligence' as a single faculty on a linear scale is alluring in its simplicity (Lucas & Claxton, 2010). It reductively deems children's learning predictable and 'unproblematically known' (Drummond & Yarker, 2013, p.5)...