2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2015.11.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Writer identification using texture descriptors of handwritten fragments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
41
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 99 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
6
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This outperforms by 0.2% the nearest best system developed by (Jain and Doermann, 2014). For the AHTID/MW database, 71.6% of Top 1 accuracy has been obtained with the proposed system which is still comparable to the state of the art, outperformed only by (Hannad et al, 2016). For the IFN/ENIT database, however, the system shows a clear drop in performance.…”
Section: Comparison Of Our Proposed System With Existing Workmentioning
confidence: 78%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This outperforms by 0.2% the nearest best system developed by (Jain and Doermann, 2014). For the AHTID/MW database, 71.6% of Top 1 accuracy has been obtained with the proposed system which is still comparable to the state of the art, outperformed only by (Hannad et al, 2016). For the IFN/ENIT database, however, the system shows a clear drop in performance.…”
Section: Comparison Of Our Proposed System With Existing Workmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…These noisy versions of the database were used to record the Top 1 accuracy of the proposed system along with two other systems previously published in literature i.e. the systems proposed by and (Hannad et al, 2016). Furthermore, a variation of our proposed system was also applied on the noisy databases, where SIFT was used for feature extraction in place of DCT.…”
Section: Robustness Of the Proposed Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Abdi and Khemakhem (2015) reported an accuracy rate of 90% for 411 writers from IFN/ENIT. Hannad et al (2016) reported an accuracy rate of 94.89% for 411 writers data from IFN/ENIT database. The comparative writer identification rates are presented in …”
Section: Results Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hannad et al (2016) introduced one more statistical feature Local Phase Quantization (LTP) in addition to LBP and LPQ. They reported an accuracy rate of 87% for 130 writers data taken from IFN/ENIT database.…”
Section: Feature Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%