2014 22nd International Conference on Pattern Recognition 2014
DOI: 10.1109/icpr.2014.526
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Writer Identification for Historical Arabic Documents

Abstract: Identification of writers of handwritten historical documents is an important and challenging task. In this paper we present several feature extraction and classification approaches for the identification of writers in historical Arabic manuscripts. The approaches are able to successfully identify writers of multipage documents. The feature extraction methods rely on different principles, such as contour-, textural-and key point-based and the classification schemes are based on averaging and voting. For all ex… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
(25 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Instead, within the context of historical texts, computerized writer identification relies on annotation of epigraphers or paleographers-specialists on ancient writing systems. Examples of such studies cover topics as diverse as ancient Greek inscriptions [22]; Byzantine and Spanish Medieval codices [23,24]; Herman Melville's alleged 19 th c. texts [25]; 13 th -20 th c. Arabic and Turkish manuscripts [26][27][28]; as well as Hebrew Second Temple [29] and Medieval [30,31] documents. This means that an often subjective opinion of "manuscript historians" https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0237962.g002…”
Section: Plos Onementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Instead, within the context of historical texts, computerized writer identification relies on annotation of epigraphers or paleographers-specialists on ancient writing systems. Examples of such studies cover topics as diverse as ancient Greek inscriptions [22]; Byzantine and Spanish Medieval codices [23,24]; Herman Melville's alleged 19 th c. texts [25]; 13 th -20 th c. Arabic and Turkish manuscripts [26][27][28]; as well as Hebrew Second Temple [29] and Medieval [30,31] documents. This means that an often subjective opinion of "manuscript historians" https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0237962.g002…”
Section: Plos Onementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A review of [22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31] and other computerized writer identification surveys [33,34] reveals another potential problem. Commonly, the employed algorithms utilize computer vision and machine learning features and procedures to produce abstract "distances" between inscriptions-e.g., based on the slant of their characters, their relative proportions, their uniformity, etc.…”
Section: Plos Onementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, the imperfect digital images present a challenge for image segmentation and enhancement methods [25,26]. Third, although the task of identifying writers in handwritten texts has been addressed in previous literature (e.g., [27][28][29][30][31][32]), researchers presuppose a reference dataset with annotated authorship be used for training purposes, which is not present in our case. Additionally, the above publications do not aim directly at recognizing or distinguishing authors.…”
Section: Algorithmic Apparatusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Apart from other methods [20][21][22][23][24], deep learning is another approach which can be used for writer identification. Convolutional neural network (CNN) is a one of the deep learning models that can be employed.…”
Section: Vinita Balbhim Patil Rajendra R Patilmentioning
confidence: 99%