1996
DOI: 10.1016/0924-980x(96)95533-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wrist tremor: investigation of agonist-antagonist interaction by means of long-term EMG recording and cross-spectral analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
33
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
33
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Statistically significant coherence between two muscle burst discharge signals was determined as 0.25 or greater. A similar methodology as described by Boose and coworkers 17 was used to interpret EMG phase relationships. An EMG phase difference of Ϫ45°to 45°was defined as co-contraction and a phase difference of 135°to 225°w as considered as alternating contraction.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Statistically significant coherence between two muscle burst discharge signals was determined as 0.25 or greater. A similar methodology as described by Boose and coworkers 17 was used to interpret EMG phase relationships. An EMG phase difference of Ϫ45°to 45°was defined as co-contraction and a phase difference of 135°to 225°w as considered as alternating contraction.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, there exist many controversies as to whether a primary writing tremor is a variant of an essential tremor or a variant of writer's cramp (14). Furthermore, the co-contraction pattern of agonist and antagonist muscle cannot always classify a type of tremor and differentiate tremor from dystonia because variable patterns of contraction were observed in the long-term EMG recording in patients with essential tremor (15). In this regard, the response to alcohol in the present patient may suggest the possibility that this patient may have suffered from a co-existing writing tremor, although the EMG findings of this patient did not correspond to a primary writing tremor.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The tremor frequency or amplitude are only poor criteria for separating PD tremor from other tremors [35]. The pattern of activation in antagonistic muscles is mostly reciprocal alternating but this is not a reliable discriminator between PD and other tremors [17,134,135]. Methods of non-linear time series analysis have been proposed to provide a more reliable tool to separate PD at least from essential tremor [36, 143] but when the same methods were applied prospectively in a larger series of patients, this distinction became much less clear [144].…”
Section: Physiological and Pathophysiological Features Of Parkinsoniamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Up to now, most studies have focused on the coherence between brain and muscle activity in voluntary movements of normal subjects [7,8,23,52,111,112]. These studies have demonstrated that some types of muscle activity are reflected in the coherence pattern at different frequency bands (15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30) and that at least the lower frequency activity seems to reflect pyramidal tract cell activity [7]. Abnormal muscle activity has only rarely been studied.…”
Section: Studies On the Coherence Between Brain And Muscle Activitymentioning
confidence: 99%