2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2013.12.031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wrist Kinematic Coupling and Performance During Functional Tasks: Effects of Constrained Motion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

2
36
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
2
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…9,17 Global wrist kinematics were calculated as the rotational movement of the third metacarpal coordinate frame with respect to the distal forearm frame. The FE axis and RUD axis are mutually orthogonal wrist joint axes both embedded in the distal forearm; pronation-supination motion was calculated but is not reported (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…9,17 Global wrist kinematics were calculated as the rotational movement of the third metacarpal coordinate frame with respect to the distal forearm frame. The FE axis and RUD axis are mutually orthogonal wrist joint axes both embedded in the distal forearm; pronation-supination motion was calculated but is not reported (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These results were compared with a historical cohort of uninjured, healthy subjects. 9 The cohort, a sample of convenience, was used to compare our data with established norms in a known group of asymptomatic individuals in order to determine which group outcomes were more closely aligned to healthy wrist function. For each outcome, between-group comparisons employed one-way analysis of variance (a ¼ 0.05) with post hoc analysis using the Fisher least significant difference test (a < 0.017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations