1999
DOI: 10.1001/archderm.135.8.991-a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wound Measurement Made Truly Simple by Point Counting

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Various methods have been developed for wound area determination. They include the use of acetate tracing and point counting [11,43] . Some new methods use specific software to determine a manually traced wound area from a photograph or an acetate sheet [44,45] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Various methods have been developed for wound area determination. They include the use of acetate tracing and point counting [11,43] . Some new methods use specific software to determine a manually traced wound area from a photograph or an acetate sheet [44,45] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The wound area has long been studied by measuring the length and width, having the shape of a rectangle or an ellipse [9] . Currently, the usual way is the acetate method that makes use of grid paper for area estimation by counting the number of squares inside the traced wound parameter [10,11] . As a result, the wound margin determination is difficult and subject to rater judgment that leads to individual variation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mean ulcer duration was ± 21 weeks and mean ulcer size was 6.7 ± 5 cm 2 . Ulcer size was measured by tracing the ulcer on a transparent plastic sheet and analysing the area by point‐counting method 6,7 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[5] There is no gold standard for validating visual tests, but their accuracy could be assessed by repetition or consensus. [5] There is no gold standard for validating visual tests, but their accuracy could be assessed by repetition or consensus.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%