2002
DOI: 10.5144/0256-4947.2002.105
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wound Infection in Cardiac Surgery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
9
1
2

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
9
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…72.1% of our SWI had positive wound culture, with S. aureus being the most common cause in both superficial and deep SWI, which chimes in with the results of similar research in the literature (33–70%) [ 4 , 5 , 7 , 8 ]. Positive blood culture was significantly higher in deep SWI than superficial SWI in our study (25% versus 4.3%, respectively).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…72.1% of our SWI had positive wound culture, with S. aureus being the most common cause in both superficial and deep SWI, which chimes in with the results of similar research in the literature (33–70%) [ 4 , 5 , 7 , 8 ]. Positive blood culture was significantly higher in deep SWI than superficial SWI in our study (25% versus 4.3%, respectively).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…The rate of SWI varies in different reports. Softah et al reported 2.5% superficial and 0.37% deep sternal wound infection among 3200 patients [ 5 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1,5,[14][15][16][17] We found that over half of the patients (62.2%) in our study had suffered from a wound-related problem at least one of these symptoms (Table 1). Wound infections are not common in cardiac surgery with rates of infection varying between 1.9% and 15% from the area from where the saphenous vein was taken.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…En una población de estudio mayor en número, el poder individual aumentaría en cada una de ellas, pudiendo ser evidenciadas con certeza estadística del mismo modo que la asociación existente entre infección y fallecimiento, donde el tamaño de muestra aumenta sustancialmente so- bre lo calculado para este estudio. Se ha estimado en ~14% la mortalidad asociada a los pacientes que desarrollan una mediastinitis [14][15][16] . La aplicabilidad del índice Toronto es viable, cuanto más si se efectúa contemporáneamente al evento y evolución quirúrgica.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified