2003
DOI: 10.1117/1.1609452
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wound healing of 6.45-μm free electron laser skin incisions with heat-conducting templates

Abstract: We have previously shown a reduction in lateral thermal damage with acute studies of skin incisions made in vitro using heat-conducting templates. Here we examined the wound-healing response to laser incisions with heat-conducting templates and explored the use of an optically transparent template with the free electron laser (FEL) at 6.45 microm. First we evaluated the effects of a sapphire heat-conducting template on the lateral thermal damage of FEL incisions using in vitro human skin samples. Next we compa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
11
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
(27 reference statements)
2
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There was no significant difference observed between the 1 and 200 ps micropulse duration at either 6.1 or 6.45 µm. The extent of thermal damage is consistent with that observed by previous authors at the same wavelength with the FEL, with 6.1 µm having significantly less damage than 6.45 µm [5,7]. There was no effect due to the micropulse duration on the type or extent of thermal damage on mouse dermis observed.…”
Section: Ablationsupporting
confidence: 94%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…There was no significant difference observed between the 1 and 200 ps micropulse duration at either 6.1 or 6.45 µm. The extent of thermal damage is consistent with that observed by previous authors at the same wavelength with the FEL, with 6.1 µm having significantly less damage than 6.45 µm [5,7]. There was no effect due to the micropulse duration on the type or extent of thermal damage on mouse dermis observed.…”
Section: Ablationsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…This difference, however, is small given the 200 fold reduction in the peak intensity, and is therefore negligible. Mouse dermis was selected as a tissue for comparing the resultant thermal damage between the two micropulse durations because it is easy to obtain and has been used by previous researchers as a marker for laser thermal damage with the FEL [5,7]. While mouse dermis is easy to obtain, the analysis of thermal damage is complicated due to the varying microstructure of the skin involving different cell types in the dermis, epidermis, and hair follicles, which leads to a great deal of variation [4].…”
Section: Ablationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Longer penetration depth will increase the number of damaged cells, while shorter penetration would result in less material removed per pulse. Whatever the underlying causes, biophysical investigations with a Mark-III free electron laser, tuned to 6.45 mm in wavelength have demonstrated minimal collateral damage and high ablation yield in ocular and neural tissues [13][14][15][16][17][18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Mark-III free electron laser (FEL), tuned to λ=6.45 µm has demonstrated the efficient ablation of soft tissue with minimal collateral damage [7][8][9][10][11][12]. While the Mark-III FEL has been used successfully in human neurosurgery and ophthalmic surgery based on these findings [7,9,10,[13][14][15][16] and has shown much promise for surgical applications, further advances are limited due to the expense and overhead related to the FEL.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%