2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2005.12.068
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wound healing and functional outcomes after infrainguinal bypass with reversed saphenous vein for critical limb ischemia

Abstract: Despite achieving the anticipated graft patency and limb salvage results, 25% of patients did not realize wound healing at 1 year of follow-up, 19% had lost ambulatory function, and 5% had lost independent living status. Prospective natural history studies are needed to further define the functional outcomes and their predictors after infrainguinal bypass for CLI.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
64
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
3
64
1
Order By: Relevance
“…4 In the management of CLI with tissue loss, delayed wound healing not only lowers QOL but also increases medical costs, even if limb loss is successfully prevented. 5,6 For BSX, reports have documented 1 year wound healing rates in the 74e85% range, and median wound healing time of 173e186 days post procedure 7,8 with regular dialysis, diabetes mellitus, low albumin level, non-ambulatory status, and Rutherford category 6 as predictors of delayed wound healing. 9 For EVT, the 1 year wound healing rate and median healing time were 54e86% and 97e145 days, respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 In the management of CLI with tissue loss, delayed wound healing not only lowers QOL but also increases medical costs, even if limb loss is successfully prevented. 5,6 For BSX, reports have documented 1 year wound healing rates in the 74e85% range, and median wound healing time of 173e186 days post procedure 7,8 with regular dialysis, diabetes mellitus, low albumin level, non-ambulatory status, and Rutherford category 6 as predictors of delayed wound healing. 9 For EVT, the 1 year wound healing rate and median healing time were 54e86% and 97e145 days, respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The recent utilization of wound healing as a primary outcome measure enables researchers to bridge this gap and investigate the impact of stress on an objective, concrete, and clinically relevant outcome, where the immune system plays a significant role [7]. Research investigating the determinants of wound healing has traditionally focused on clinical and biomedical factors (i.e., size of wound, dressing type, extent of pathology) associated with speed of healing [8][9][10]. However, recently the potential impact of psychosocial factors, including psychological stress, has been investigated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All patients had PTA, and 983 patients (98.9%) had at least one open artery down to the foot. The 5-year primary patency was 88% (95% CI: 86-91%) [40]. Revascularization led to a significant increase in vascular parameters (ABI and TcPO 2 ), with only 34 (3.4%) cases of complications [13].…”
Section: Revascularization By Primary Ptamentioning
confidence: 95%
“…However, there are also substantial differences in healing time between neuropathic and ischaemic/neuroischaemic DFUs even after successful revascularization. In fact, healing rates are around 80% after 4 months of treatment in cases of neuropathy without PAD and only 40% after 6 months, whereas the rate is around 70% after 12 months with PAD, even with successful revascularization [28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44]71]. Thus, it is essential to look beyond macroangiopathy and the concept of vascular stenosis.…”
Section: The Link Between Healing and Pad: Room For Other Actorsmentioning
confidence: 99%