2000
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1096-9101(2000)26:1<22::aid-lsm5>3.0.co;2-r
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wound healing and collagen thermal damage in 7.5-?sec pulsed CO2 laser skin incisions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
1
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
24
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The use of PIRL can open up new surgical methods where scar tissue formation is particularly debilitating [16]. This approach may have general applications in reducing hyperplastic scarring and also cosmetic application in the revision of existing hyperplastic scars.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of PIRL can open up new surgical methods where scar tissue formation is particularly debilitating [16]. This approach may have general applications in reducing hyperplastic scarring and also cosmetic application in the revision of existing hyperplastic scars.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7,19,27,30,36 Another way to cleanse infected wounds is with the CO 2 laser. 1,8,10,11,19,22,25,26 A previous study found that the CO 2 laser promotes, on soft tissues, a more rapid reepithelialization, with increased neovascularization and improved collagen synthesis by fibroblasts. 34 The use of the CO 2 laser does not result in postsurgical bacteremia, which is an important factor in treating elderly patients, patients with cancer, or patients with some kind of immunosuppression.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…27 Due to this fundamental difference, it was initially hypothesized that 6.45 μ m may target protein bands more effectively than 6.10 μ m, and this superior targeting may lead to greater disruption of the tissue matrix, less violent tissue removal, and less collateral damage. 14 With this in mind, the structural failure of proteins was investigated by analyzing ablation plumes and ejected tissue fragments. 8,27 In contrast, more recent evidence suggests that 6.1 μ m is superior, because it gives lower ablation thresholds, higher ablation yields, and less collateral tissue damage in biological tissues.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%