2016
DOI: 10.1038/jp.2016.89
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wound complications in obese women after cesarean: a comparison of staples versus subcuticular suture

Abstract: In obese women, skin closure with staples at the time of CD is associated with a higher rate of wound complications compared with subcuticular suture. Skin closure with subcuticular suture over staples should be considered in obese women undergoing a CD regardless of skin incision type.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Women with incisions closed using subcuticular suture were significantly less likely to develop a wound complication (RR 0.49, 95% CI 0.28 to 0.87) and had a longer operative time (MD 7 min, 95% CI, 3.10-11.31) compared to women with incisions closed with staples (Mackeen et al 2015). A similar result was obtained by Zaki et al when analyzing wound complications in women with a prepregnancy BMI of 30 or greater: use of staples was associated with a higher rate of wound complications than use of subcuticular suture (adjusted RR 1.78, 95% CI 1.27 to 2.49) (Zaki et al 2016). No significant difference in wound complications has been shown when comparing subcuticular suture to subcuticular absorbable staples (Schrufer-Poland et al 2016), monofilament suture to braided multifilament suture (Methodius G. , or subcuticular suture to skin glue (Daykan et al 2017).…”
Section: Wound Closuresupporting
confidence: 67%
“…Women with incisions closed using subcuticular suture were significantly less likely to develop a wound complication (RR 0.49, 95% CI 0.28 to 0.87) and had a longer operative time (MD 7 min, 95% CI, 3.10-11.31) compared to women with incisions closed with staples (Mackeen et al 2015). A similar result was obtained by Zaki et al when analyzing wound complications in women with a prepregnancy BMI of 30 or greater: use of staples was associated with a higher rate of wound complications than use of subcuticular suture (adjusted RR 1.78, 95% CI 1.27 to 2.49) (Zaki et al 2016). No significant difference in wound complications has been shown when comparing subcuticular suture to subcuticular absorbable staples (Schrufer-Poland et al 2016), monofilament suture to braided multifilament suture (Methodius G. , or subcuticular suture to skin glue (Daykan et al 2017).…”
Section: Wound Closuresupporting
confidence: 67%
“…The research was carried out in ten different countries, on four continents, mainly in North America. Twenty-three studies were conducted in the United States [10,11,28,29,[31][32][33][34]36,39,40,42,43,[46][47][48][50][51][52][53][55][56][57], and the remaining studies were carried out in Egypt [22,30,32,41], Denmark [44], India [35], Japan [25], Canada [54], Australia [21,58], and New Zealand [49]. Moreover, one study concerned women living in England or Ireland [38] and one in Scotland [46].…”
Section: Characteristics Of Included Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the studies included both elective and unplanned caesarean sections (n = 14) with the exception of three studies that included emergency caesarean sections as the exclusion criterion [29][30][31]. In five cases, the surgical procedure was generally referred to as a caesarean section [10,26,34,38,41].…”
Section: Characteristics Of Included Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As mentioned in Section 6.3, subcuticular closure with suture reduces chances of wound complications in obese women [73]. Skin closure with staples is associated with a higher chance of wound complication (infection, separation) in obese women within 6 weeks of delivery [83]. However, this effect did not persist in women with class III obesity (BMI ≥ 40 kg/m 2 [84].…”
Section: Prevention Of Surgical Site Infectionsmentioning
confidence: 99%