2019
DOI: 10.1177/2167702619869184
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Worsening of Self-Reported Symptoms Through Suggestive Feedback

Abstract: Previous studies found that misleading feedback may increase self-reported symptoms. Does this reflect social demand or internalized misinformation? We investigated whether suggestive misinformation may escalate symptoms when it is provided in a context that minimizes social demand. Eighty participants completed the Checklist for Symptoms in Daily Life twice. Between test and retest, participants were given standardized symptom feedback through a bogus computer program that allegedly produced an analysis of th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 21 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, in observational online research such as the WARN-D study, where participants do not receive the report under supervision, special care must be taken to ensure that participants do not experience potentially harmful consequences from the reports. While assessing clinical constructs such as suicidality does not appear to increase suicidal behavior (DeCou & Schumann, 2018 ), there is less research on providing feedback to participants (especially in online settings), and there is evidence that receiving false information as feedback can lead to a worsening of symptoms (van Helvoort et al, 2020 ). To minimize potential harm, we did not include variables that could be used to infer psychopathological states to avoid iatrogenic effects; this was based on the iterative process for variable selection described in the “ Methods ” section.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, in observational online research such as the WARN-D study, where participants do not receive the report under supervision, special care must be taken to ensure that participants do not experience potentially harmful consequences from the reports. While assessing clinical constructs such as suicidality does not appear to increase suicidal behavior (DeCou & Schumann, 2018 ), there is less research on providing feedback to participants (especially in online settings), and there is evidence that receiving false information as feedback can lead to a worsening of symptoms (van Helvoort et al, 2020 ). To minimize potential harm, we did not include variables that could be used to infer psychopathological states to avoid iatrogenic effects; this was based on the iterative process for variable selection described in the “ Methods ” section.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%