2015
DOI: 10.1097/aap.0000000000000203
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Worsening of Neurologic Symptoms After Spinal Anesthesia in Two Patients With Spinal Stenosis

Abstract: We conclude that, until the relative contribution of patient and surgical (eg, positioning, retractors, hypotension) factors is known, the decision to perform neuraxial blockade in patients with severe symptoms of neuroclaudication or recently progressive symptomatic spinal stenosis should be made cautiously. Avoidance of spinal anesthesia is suggested for any procedure with prolonged lordotic positioning or any position that might cause a compromise of the spinal canal because subarachnoid block may contribut… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…54 In the study by Hebl et al, 53 4 of the 10 patients who developed new deficits or complained of progression of their deficits after neuraxial anesthesia suffered from spinal stenosis. The patients' symptoms may have been related to progression of their stenosis.…”
Section: Worsening Of Back Pain After Neuraxial Anesthesiamentioning
confidence: 98%
“…54 In the study by Hebl et al, 53 4 of the 10 patients who developed new deficits or complained of progression of their deficits after neuraxial anesthesia suffered from spinal stenosis. The patients' symptoms may have been related to progression of their stenosis.…”
Section: Worsening Of Back Pain After Neuraxial Anesthesiamentioning
confidence: 98%
“…13 Although the preponderance of these injuries have been associated with epidural or combined spinal-epidural techniques, 28 injuries have also been associated with spinal anesthesia. 58,116 As supported by a few large population studies and a multitude of case reports and series, 13 the advisory panel speculates that patients with spinal stenosis may be especially vulnerable to These recommendations are intended to encourage optimal patient care but cannot ensure the avoidance of adverse outcomes. As with any practice advisory recommendation, these are subject to revision as knowledge advances regarding specific complications.…”
Section: Spinal Stenosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is rarely caused by congenital malformations. Pre‐existing stenosis may contribute to spinal cord injury because the narrower canal cross‐sectional area in such patients renders them more at risk of nerve compression or local anaesthetic neurotoxicity . The severity of a given injury in these patients may also be higher compared with the general population .…”
Section: Pathophysiology Of Spinal Cord Injurymentioning
confidence: 99%