2000
DOI: 10.1080/10615800008549263
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Worrying Leads to Reduced Concreteness of Problem Elaborations: Evidence for the Avoidance Theory of Worry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
(21 reference statements)
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Empirical evidence for the reduced-concreteness theory of worry comes from two series of studies with nonclinical student participants (Stöber, 1996;Stöber, Tepperwien, & Staak, 2000). In these studies, participants were presented with the Worry Domains Questionnaire (WDQ; Tallis, Eysenck, & Mathews, 1992), a widely-used questionnaire for the measurement of nonpathological worry.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Empirical evidence for the reduced-concreteness theory of worry comes from two series of studies with nonclinical student participants (Stöber, 1996;Stöber, Tepperwien, & Staak, 2000). In these studies, participants were presented with the Worry Domains Questionnaire (WDQ; Tallis, Eysenck, & Mathews, 1992), a widely-used questionnaire for the measurement of nonpathological worry.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, all previous studies on worry and reduced concreteness (Stöber, 1996;Stöber et al, 2000) have been conducted with nonclinical student samples. Therefore, the clinical significance of the reduced-concreteness theory of worry still needs to be demonstrated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Imagery seems to be no longer allowed due to excessive thought contained in worry process (Borkovec et al, 2004). Given the dualcoding theory, the verbal nature of worry limits accessibility to parallel-processed images, particularly in cases of catastrophic images in which they become less vivid and intrusive (Paivio, 1986;Stöber, 1997;Stöber, Tepperwien, & Staak, 2000). Worry may function as an avoidance response originate from distress triggered by the cues of threat stimuli which may be in forms of fantasy or imagery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using Pennebaker's expressive writing task, content from the participant's Time 1 writing was analyzed in order to determine his or her processing mode using a continuous measure of the dimension from concrete to abstract (see appendix for scoring manual). Two raters taught with training materials and unaware of the hypotheses of the project read over each Time 1 experimental writing independently and rated the content on its level of concreteness on a 5-point scale (1-abstract, or indistinct, cross-situational, equivocal, unclear, aggregated, 5-concrete, or distinct, situationally specific, unequivocal, clear, singular) (Stöber, Tepperwien, & Staak, 2000).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Assessing a participant's spontaneous processing mode could be an important illustration of their coping strategies and overall state of mind. Stöber, Tepperwien, and Staak (2000) originally created the concreteness scale to measure problem elaborations, or problem antecedents and negative consequences. Participants wrote three sentences for each of these two categories and then were rated for their concreteness.…”
Section: Emotional Processing and Copingmentioning
confidence: 99%