2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.trac.2019.02.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Worldwide trends in tracing poly- and perfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in the environment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
138
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 259 publications
(154 citation statements)
references
References 93 publications
0
138
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent analytical developments now also allow the use of suspect screening and non-targeted techniques for PFAS assessment. These evolving and promising techniques already have been used to explore complex mixtures and identify many unexpected PFAS, but sample preparation and data analysis procedures in many instances have yet to be standardized(Nakayama et al 2019).Analytical standards are also needed to accurately identify and quantify novel PFAS.Systematic monitoring programs should be implemented to routinely assess PFAS concentrations and the spatial extent of PFAS in multiple environmental matrices: soil, water, sediment, and biota. For example, in the United States, the National Water-Quality Assessment and the National Water Quality Network programs coordinated by the US Geological Survey monitor for contaminants and water quality across a network of surface monitoring stations and wells, respectively.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent analytical developments now also allow the use of suspect screening and non-targeted techniques for PFAS assessment. These evolving and promising techniques already have been used to explore complex mixtures and identify many unexpected PFAS, but sample preparation and data analysis procedures in many instances have yet to be standardized(Nakayama et al 2019).Analytical standards are also needed to accurately identify and quantify novel PFAS.Systematic monitoring programs should be implemented to routinely assess PFAS concentrations and the spatial extent of PFAS in multiple environmental matrices: soil, water, sediment, and biota. For example, in the United States, the National Water-Quality Assessment and the National Water Quality Network programs coordinated by the US Geological Survey monitor for contaminants and water quality across a network of surface monitoring stations and wells, respectively.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aqueous samples are typically analyzed for PFASs using liquid-liquid extraction, ion-pair extraction, or solid-phase extraction followed by HPLC-MS/MS or GC/MS [29]. In 2009, the USEPA released Method 537 for the analysis of 14 PFASs in drinking water using solid-phase extraction followed by Liquid Chromatography/Tandem Mass Spectrometry (LC/MS/MS) [30].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Surveying the existing literature concerning PFASs in environmental ambience of the last two decades, it is evident that reported cases of contamination have grown drastically, whereas new insights of PFAS degradation slowly progressed [ 48 ]. Both advanced oxidation and reduction defluorination processes (AOP, ARP) have been developed, utilizing different reaction conditions ranging from basic thermal treatments up to sophisticated photooxidation catalysts [ 62 , 76 ].…”
Section: Future Prospect—applicability In Remediationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PFAS exposure led to the contamination of drinking water systems [ 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 ], river and lake sediments [ 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 ], soils [ 38 , 39 , 40 ], crops [ 41 , 42 , 43 ] and animals [ 44 , 45 , 46 ], as shown by numerous investigations. Moreover, PFASs were detected in deep ocean water samples [ 47 ], in the atmosphere [ 48 ] as well as in the Arctic environment [ 49 ]. Human PFAS intake is caused by the exposure of treated consumables but can be mainly traced back to the human food chain.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%