2021
DOI: 10.1038/s41597-021-00861-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Worldwide continuous gap-filled MODIS land surface temperature dataset

Abstract: Satellite land surface temperature (LST) is vital for climatological and environmental studies. However, LST datasets are not continuous in time and space mainly due to cloud cover. Here we combine LST with Climate Forecast System Version 2 (CFSv2) modeled temperatures to derive a continuous gap filled global LST dataset at a spatial resolution of 1 km. Temporal Fourier analysis is used to derive the seasonality (climatology) on a pixel-by-pixel basis, for LST and CFSv2 temperatures. Gaps are filled by adding … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
26
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
2
26
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, the average RMSE is 1.83 and 1.28 • in the urban and surrounding areas for daytime and nighttime, respectively (Table 1). The gap-filled LSTs based on the data fusion method implemented on GEE (Shiff et al, 2021) were also evaluated at the global scale, but the mean RMSE is 2.7 • , higher than that of this study. The accuracies of other seamless LST datasets were generally evaluated based on a limited number of in situ LST observations (Zhang et al, 2019;Zhou et al, 2017), which are not exactly the same as satellite LSTs (Hong et al, 2021), and the evaluation in these studies are not directly comparable with our study.…”
Section: Comparison With Existing Seamless Lst Datacontrasting
confidence: 67%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In this study, the average RMSE is 1.83 and 1.28 • in the urban and surrounding areas for daytime and nighttime, respectively (Table 1). The gap-filled LSTs based on the data fusion method implemented on GEE (Shiff et al, 2021) were also evaluated at the global scale, but the mean RMSE is 2.7 • , higher than that of this study. The accuracies of other seamless LST datasets were generally evaluated based on a limited number of in situ LST observations (Zhang et al, 2019;Zhou et al, 2017), which are not exactly the same as satellite LSTs (Hong et al, 2021), and the evaluation in these studies are not directly comparable with our study.…”
Section: Comparison With Existing Seamless Lst Datacontrasting
confidence: 67%
“…The systematic differences between neighboring regions with the use of different gap-filling techniques in the hybrid method may lead to boundary effects (Li et al, 2018a). The data fusion method implemented on GEE (Shiff et al, 2021) directly filled the missing values in MODIS LST using the estimated LST values without consideration of the spatial continuity, which might lead to boundary effects. The seamless LST data produced by might also contain boundary effects since different regression methods were used to reconstruct the missing values according to the number of valid pixels.…”
Section: Comparison With Existing Seamless Lst Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The LST at a specific time and date can be regarded as consisting of two parts: one is the long-term mean of the temperature at that time (climatological temperature), and the other is the deviation from that climatological temperature due to the weather (anomaly temperature) 17 . First, we calculate the climatological temperatures of the ideal, clear-sky satellite and the -ERA5-Land LSTs by using the reconstructed ideal clear-sky MODIS LST and ERA5-land LST data from 2002 to 2020: where is the climatological temperature of the ideal, clear-sky satellite on day i of the year, is the mean of the reconstructed ideal clear-sky MODIS LST on day i of each year from 2002 to 2020, is the climatological temperature of the ERA5-Land LST on day i of the year, and is the mean of the ERA5-Land LST on day i of each year from 2002 to 2020.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Field and in-situ measurements are not easily affected by weather or other factors, and LSTs can be obtained continuously over time. However, the usefulness of such data is poor when the field stations are sparsely distributed 17 . Most model reanalysis datasets, such as the Modern-Era Retrospective Analysis for Research and Applications (MERRA) dataset, National Center for Environmental Prediction (NCEP) products, and the European Center for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) Reanalysis product ERA-Interim 18 , can provide spatiotemporally continuous LSTs at a global scale.…”
Section: Background and Summarymentioning
confidence: 99%