World-wide collaboration among medical specialties in smoking research: production, collaboration, visibility and influence

Granda‐Orive, José Ignacio de; Villanueva-Serrano, Santiago; Benavent, Rafael Aleixandre; Valderrama‐Zurián, Juan Carlos; Alonso-Arroyo, Adolfo; Río, Francisco García; Ruiz, Carlos A. Jiménez; Reina, Segismundo Solano; Albiach, José Manuel Martínez

doi:10.3152/095820209x393163

Cited by 16 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Siguiendo la metodología de otros estudios (Valderrama y otros, 1997; Álvarez y Aleixandre 2001, Valderrama y otros, 2017), y para poder disponer de forma exhaustiva de la información científica sobre adicciones, tanto a sustancias químicas como comportamentales, y sobre trastornos de la alimentación se han utilizado las bases de datos bibliográficas: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE) y Social Science Citation Index (SSCI) incluídas en Web of Science Core Collection (WoS) de Clarivate Analytics, Scopus de Elsevier, que incluye Medline; Bases de datos del Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas-CSIC (hoy en día accesibles a través de "Índices CSIC"). Estas bases de datos son las habitualmente utilizadas en los estudios bibliométricos, pues incluyen las revistas de mayor importancia y calidad a nivel nacional e internacional, y han sido empleadas ampliamente por numerosos investigadores (Arbinaga, 2002;Granda-Orive, 2009;Villanueva y otros, 2007;Bramness y otros, 2014;Li y otros, 2015).…”

Section: Materials Y Métodosunclassified

Investigación española en las áreas de adicciones y de trastornos de la alimentación: análisis de la producción, colaboración e impacto científico (1962-2017)

et al. 2021

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Las adicciones y los trastornos de la alimentación constituyen uno de los principales problemas de salud en la sociedad contemporánea al que se destinan gran cantidad de recursos destinados a la investigación para su prevención y tratamiento. Objetivos. Analizar la investigación española en el área de adicciones y trastornos de la alimentación desde que se publicó el primer trabajo recogido en bases de datos bibliográficas y desde una perspectiva bibliométrica. Metodología. Para obtener la información necesaria se consultaron las bases de datos Web of Science, Scopus y bases de datos del CSIC. Se elaboró un perfil de búsqueda específico. Se obtuvieron indicadores bibliométricos de producción, colaboración e impacto científico. Se utilizó el análisis de redes sociales para identificar las redes de investigadores y sus relaciones de colaboración, así como la red de co-palabras clave. Resultados. La producción científica aumentó progresivamente durante los casi 50 años analizados. Los trabajos se publicaron en una gran variedad de revistas nacionales y extranjeras, entre las que destacaron Adicciones, Revista Española de Drogodependencias, Trastornos Adictivos y Salud y Drogas. Conclusiones. La producción, colaboración e impacto de la investigación ha sido creciente y las adicciones más estudiadas fueron el tabaquismo, alcoholismo, consumo de cocaína y consumo de anfetaminas.

show abstract

Section: Materials Y Métodosunclassified

Investigación española en las áreas de adicciones y de trastornos de la alimentación: análisis de la producción, colaboración e impacto científico (1962-2017)

et al. 2021

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…[4,5,6,7] The widely spread explanation of the increasing trend of co-authorship is that co-authorship has an advantage over independent solo publication strategy because collaborative work increases research productivity both in terms of quality and quantity of publications. The assumption is that productivity rises because the studies may not hold for countries with lower levels of science and technology capacity.…”

Section: Review Of the Literaturementioning

confidence: 99%

Combining Brokerage and Bonding in Co-Authorship: A Useful Strategy of Social Capital Accumulation

Kuzhabekova¹

2018

JSCIRES

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study explores the relationship between co-authorship tendencies and research productivity. The study uses Coleman's and Burt's theories of social capital to explain how productivity arises from co-authorship and to distinguish between co-authorship tendencies. The data was obtained from the ISI Web of Science and included bibliographic records of scholarly articles published in leading Russian journals in cardiology during the period 2004-2009. The study was conducted in two phases. First, methods from social network analysis were used to determine co-authorship tendencies of each researcher in the dataset. Second, descriptive and inferential statistics (analysis of variance) were applied to determine the distribution of researchers across types of co-authorship tendencies and to assess the relationship between the tendencies and individual research productivity. A key finding of the study is that all hypothesized co-authorship tendencies are present in the field of Russian cardiologic research, although to a different extent. The most common form of co-authorship among the authors publishing in the Russian cardiologic journals was the combination tendency, with the bonding tendency being most underutilized. Finally, our analysis revealed significant difference in mean productivity levels among the co-authorship tendencies. The mean level of productivity for bridging co-authorship tendency was the highest among all the tendencies, while the mean level of productivity for bonding strategy was the lowest. The study confirmed the results of prior studies that co-authorships, in which a researcher serves as a broker among otherwise disconnected researchers, are more productive, indicating that serving as a broker creates more social capital than maintaining cohesive ties.

show abstract

“…21 Correlation between production and collaboration -a proxy for networks -in a specific discipline has also been reported. 6 Highly productive authors have higher than average rates of collaboration.…”

Section: Volume 112 | Number 5/6mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…5 Thirdly, networks improve the possibilities of expanding the capacities of knowledge production. 6 Fourthly, networks can widen the circle of contacts, which leads to extensive participation in scientific matters, and to collaborative research enterprises. 6 Literature on scientific networks enables us to conceptualise social structures as a set of ties and helps us to focus on the characteristics of the ties in the scientific system.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…6 Fourthly, networks can widen the circle of contacts, which leads to extensive participation in scientific matters, and to collaborative research enterprises. 6 Literature on scientific networks enables us to conceptualise social structures as a set of ties and helps us to focus on the characteristics of the ties in the scientific system. 7 Professional contacts are intentionally established by scientists, with a view to conduct, produce and publish new knowledge.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Scientific networks in the production of knowledge in South Africa

Sooryamoorthy¹

2016

S. Afr. J. Sci.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

World-wide collaboration among medical specialties in smoking research: production, collaboration, visibility and influence

Cited by 16 publications

References 0 publications

Investigación española en las áreas de adicciones y de trastornos de la alimentación: análisis de la producción, colaboración e impacto científico (1962-2017)

Investigación española en las áreas de adicciones y de trastornos de la alimentación: análisis de la producción, colaboración e impacto científico (1962-2017)

Combining Brokerage and Bonding in Co-Authorship: A Useful Strategy of Social Capital Accumulation

Scientific networks in the production of knowledge in South Africa

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About