Abstract:BackgroundThe aim of this study was to assess the prevalence, perpetrators and factors associated with workplace violence against nurses in public secondary health care facilities from two health regions in the Gambia.MethodsData was collected from 219 nurses using self-administered questionnaire and 35 face-to-face interviews. The data collection was conducted between July and September 2014 in 14 public secondary health care facilities.ResultsA sizable majority of respondents (62.1%) reported exposure to vio… Show more
“…Results of gender difference in the prevalence of sexual harassment have been mixed. In some studies, workplaces with higher proportion of females were associated with increased risk of sexual harassment (Boafo et al, ; Celik & Celik, ; Cogin & Fah, ), while opposite findings were also reported (Sisawo, Ouedraogo, & Huang, ; Zeng et al, ). In this meta‐analysis, compared with male nurses, female nurses reported lower prevalence of sexual harassment.…”
Aims
Sexual harassment towards nurses is a major concern universally, but no meta‐analysis on the worldwide prevalence of sexual harassment towards nurses has yet been published. This study examined the worldwide prevalence of sexual harassment against nurses and explored its moderating factors.
Design
Meta‐analysis of observational studies.
Data sources
The PubMed, PsycINFO, EMBASE, and Web of Science databases from their commencement date to February 2018 were systematically and independently searched by two investigators.
Review methods
Data on the prevalence of sexual harassment experienced by nurses were extracted and pooled using the random‐effects model.
Results
A total of 43 studies covering 52,345 nurses were included in the analyses. Female nurses accounted for 83.87% of the 32,970 subjects in 25 studies with available data on gender ratio. The prevalence of sexual harassment towards nurses in the past 12 months and during nursing career were 12.6% (95% CI: 10.9–14.4%) and 53.4% (95% CI: 23.1–83.7%), respectively. Gender, use of the WHO questionnaires, lower middle‐income and high‐income countries, sample size, survey year, and mean age of subjects were significantly associated with the prevalence of sexual harassment.
Conclusion
The high prevalence of sexual harassment against nurses found in this meta‐analysis represents the ongoing sexism and deleterious effects (e.g., poor work quality and efficiency, increased stress and job dissatisfaction) in the profession. Appropriate preventive measures, training, and empowerment of nurses are needed to ensure workplace safety and equality in this profession.
Impact
The study addressed the worldwide prevalence of sexual harassment against nurses and its moderating factors. Health authorities and hospital administrators should develop organizational policy and preventive strategies to ensure nurses’ workplace safety and equality.
“…Results of gender difference in the prevalence of sexual harassment have been mixed. In some studies, workplaces with higher proportion of females were associated with increased risk of sexual harassment (Boafo et al, ; Celik & Celik, ; Cogin & Fah, ), while opposite findings were also reported (Sisawo, Ouedraogo, & Huang, ; Zeng et al, ). In this meta‐analysis, compared with male nurses, female nurses reported lower prevalence of sexual harassment.…”
Aims
Sexual harassment towards nurses is a major concern universally, but no meta‐analysis on the worldwide prevalence of sexual harassment towards nurses has yet been published. This study examined the worldwide prevalence of sexual harassment against nurses and explored its moderating factors.
Design
Meta‐analysis of observational studies.
Data sources
The PubMed, PsycINFO, EMBASE, and Web of Science databases from their commencement date to February 2018 were systematically and independently searched by two investigators.
Review methods
Data on the prevalence of sexual harassment experienced by nurses were extracted and pooled using the random‐effects model.
Results
A total of 43 studies covering 52,345 nurses were included in the analyses. Female nurses accounted for 83.87% of the 32,970 subjects in 25 studies with available data on gender ratio. The prevalence of sexual harassment towards nurses in the past 12 months and during nursing career were 12.6% (95% CI: 10.9–14.4%) and 53.4% (95% CI: 23.1–83.7%), respectively. Gender, use of the WHO questionnaires, lower middle‐income and high‐income countries, sample size, survey year, and mean age of subjects were significantly associated with the prevalence of sexual harassment.
Conclusion
The high prevalence of sexual harassment against nurses found in this meta‐analysis represents the ongoing sexism and deleterious effects (e.g., poor work quality and efficiency, increased stress and job dissatisfaction) in the profession. Appropriate preventive measures, training, and empowerment of nurses are needed to ensure workplace safety and equality in this profession.
Impact
The study addressed the worldwide prevalence of sexual harassment against nurses and its moderating factors. Health authorities and hospital administrators should develop organizational policy and preventive strategies to ensure nurses’ workplace safety and equality.
“…Several cross sectional surveys have been conducted in various parts of the world, but surprisingly, qualitative (perception) studies have scarcely been performed. 32,33,[41][42][43] The perception of young doctors has remained almost unexplored hitherto. To our knowledge this is the first qualitative study in India which has explored the perception of young (junior) doctors regarding health care work place violence.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30] In other parts of the world also, several studies have been conducted. [31][32][33][34][35][36][37] By means of their all India surveys, Indian Medical Association (IMA) have reported that 75% doctors had experienced violence and 82.7% felt stressed out. 3,5,10 Nonetheless, there exits a dearth of qualitative studies on this problem.…”
Background: Health care work place violence (HCWPV) is four times higher compared to violence against other professions. The problem remains under-reported and under-researched. Qualitative perception studies among junior doctors have not been paid due attention hitherto.Methods: Six individual face-to-face-indepth-interviews and six focus-group-discussions were conducted during December 2017 and January 2018 among 41 young doctors (interns, resident doctors i.e. post graduate students and young clinical faculty members). Thematic (content) analysis method was used for analysis of the data (texts).Results: Relevance, causes as well as consequences of HCWPV and measures for its prevention and control were brought up and discussed. Four themes emerged in thematic analysis. Almost all of the participants believed that it is an extremely important topic. Causation is multifactorial whereby all stakeholders are responsible. Consequences are affecting the whole society not merely the victims. Measures suggested were related to - in view of the causes - medical profession; patients and society; behavior and process; system and administration.Conclusions: Increasing materialism and eclipse of humanitarian values, media-created-violence, negative image of medical profession, patient-physician-distrust, zero-protection for doctors, apathetic governments and deficiencies in the process of justice are among the main causes of HCWPV. Junior doctors were not much optimistic of any improvement in near future in their safety and security as this would require more probity and unity among doctors and a clientele, a Health Care Delivery System, the Governments and a Judiciary much different from what it is today.
“…Four items that are widely used in international studies were used to measure nurse experienced workplace violence (Hanrahan, Kumar, & Aiken, ; Sisawo, Ouédraogo, & Huang, ). Two items were used to measure verbal abuse, and the other two were used to measure physical abuse.…”
Aim
We aimed to test a model examining the direct and indirect effects of the work environment on workplace violence, nurse burnout and work attitudes of Chinese hospital nurses.
Background
Work environment is a key factor related to nurses' work attitudes. There has been limited information about how the work environment influences nurses' work attitudes.
Method
This was a cross‐sectional study that included 1,517 hospital nurses in 111 medical/surgical units in 23 hospitals from Guangdong province, China. Structural equation modelling was used to test a hypothesized model that supposed work environment has both direct and indirect effects on work attitudes (e.g. job satisfaction and intention to leave) through workplace violence and nurse burnout.
Results
Better work environment was related to higher job satisfaction and lower intention to leave both directly and indirectly through two mediators: workplace violence and burnout. Burnout mediated the association of workplace violence with job satisfaction and intention to leave.
Conclusions
Improving work environment would promote nurse safety and subsequently contribute to stabilize the nurse workforce.
Implications for Nursing Management
To help nurses achieve safety and improved work attitudes, nurse managers should build a positive work environment and help nurses who have experienced workplace violence relieve their burnout.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.