Workplace Stress and Productivity: A Cross-Sectional Study

Abstract

INTRODUCTION. The primary purpose of this study was to evaluate the association between workplace stress and productivity among employees from worksites participating in a WorkWell KS Well-Being workshop and assess any differences by gender and race. METHODS. A multi-site, cross-sectional study was conducted to survey employees across four worksites participating in a WorkWell KS Well Being workshop to assess levels of stress and productivity. Stress was measured by the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) and productivity was measured by the Health and Work Questionnaire (HWQ). Pearson correlations were conducted to measure the association between stress and productivity scores. T-tests evaluated differences in scores by gender and race. RESULTS. Of the 186 participants who completed the survey, most reported being white (94%), female (85%), married (80%), and having a college degree (74%). A significant inverse relationship was observed between the scores for PSS and HWQ, r = -0.35, p < 0.001; as stress increased, productivity appeared to decrease. Another notable inverse relationship was PSS with Work Satisfaction subscale, r = -0.61, p < 0.001. One difference was observed by gender- males scored significantly higher on the HWQ Supervisor Relations subscale compared with females, 8.4 (2.1) vs. 6.9 (2.7), respectively, p = 0.005. CONCLUSIONS. Scores from PSS and the HWQ appeared to be inversely correlated; higher stress scores were significantly associated with lower productivity scores. This negative association was observed for all HWQ subscales, but was especially strong for work satisfaction. This study also suggests that males may have better supervisor relations compared with females, although no gender differences were observed by perceived levels of stress.

Levels of work stress among information technology professionals during COVID-19 pandemic in an Indian metropolis

“…[ 19 20 ] Prolonged commutation to work may lead to increased tiredness and fatigue, erratic working hours, and constant time pressure and act as a catalyst for increasing work stress. [ 21 22 23 ] However, we have not undertaken detailed assessment of factors associated with each reported work stressor as it is out of purview of the tool and this study. The detailed socio-demographic factors were part of a greater validation study; hence, there was no association between the factors studied and work stress.…”

Effects of Sedentary Behavior Interventions on Mental Well-Being and Work Performance While Working from Home during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial

“…Moderate improvements were seen in fatigue and work performance (focus, work satisfaction, non-work satisfaction and productivity). The pilot nature of this study makes it inappropriate to determine the statistical significance of the results; however, the effect sizes of changes in positive affect, fatigue, focus, and work satisfaction, are still noteworthy and encouraging because low mood, poor focus and high fatigue levels are associated with decreased employee productivity, whereas greater work satisfaction is associated with increased productivity [ 33 , 41 , 42 , 43 ]. The current study’s findings are similar to those of previous randomized controlled trials, such as Stand More AT (SMArT) Work and Stand Up Victoria [ 13 , 14 ].…”

Identification and assessment of stress and associated stressors among veterinary students in India using a cross-sectional questionnaire survey

“…The more number of students under high to severe stress category in the current study is a serious concern. The moderate level of stress responded by students, might be necessary and manageable to provide motivation and increased productivity ( 24 ). Evidences suggest that a moderate level of stress strengthens the connection between neurons in the brain, leading to the improvement in attention span, and memory, and thus enhanced productivity ( 15 , 25 ).…”