Workplace fairness versus unfairness: Examining the differential salience of facets of organizational justice

Cojuharenco, Irina; Patient, David

doi:10.1111/joop.12023

Cited by 28 publications

(17 citation statements)

References 76 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Further, given the asymmetrical impact that resource loss and resource gain can have, researchers may need to consider ways to measure those processes separately. Research concerning the differences between measuring positive and negative elements of a similar construct (e.g., justice and injustice; Cojuharenco & Patient, 2013) may provide insight on how best to approach this issue.…”

Section: Resource Measurement and Research Designsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Getting to the “COR”

Halbesleben

Neveu

Paustian‐Underdahl

et al. 2014

Journal of Management

1,892

1,370

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Proposed as a theory of motivation, the basic tenet of conservation of resources (COR) theory is that humans are motivated to protect their current resources and acquire new resources. Despite its recent popularity in the organizational behavior literature, several criticisms of the theory have emerged, primarily related to the central concept of resources. In this review, we address concerns regarding the conceptualization, conservation, acquisition, fluctuation, and measurement of resources. We highlight gaps in the COR literature that can be addressed by integrating research from other areas of psychology and management. In this manner, we hope to push the COR literature forward by resolving several concerns and providing suggestions for future research that might address other concerns.

show abstract

Section: Resource Measurement and Research Designsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Getting to the “COR”

Halbesleben

Neveu

Paustian‐Underdahl

et al. 2014

Journal of Management

1,892

1,370

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The results suggest CLT may provide a useful theoretical framework for understanding the interplay between justice facets, overall justice, and individuals' reactions to fairness. CLT has already been used in justice research to understand the differences in the salience of justice facets (Cojuharenco et al 2011;Cojuharenco and Patient 2013). Our research suggests CLT also allows understanding the relative importance of overall justice versus justice facets.…”

Section: The Interplay Between Anticipatory Justice Facets and Overalmentioning

confidence: 87%

“…Recently, justice research has utilized CLT to better understand justice reasoning (Cojuharenco et al 2011;Cojuharenco and Patient 2013). In their 2011 study, Cojuharenco, Patient, and Bashshur explored the effects of temporal perspective on the salience of different types of injustice.…”

Section: Informational Distance During the Preimplementation Phase Ofmentioning

confidence: 98%

Will I Cooperate? The Moderating Role of Informational Distance on Justice Reasoning

2015

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study examines the influence of a dimension of a strategic organizational change context-namely informational distance-on employees' justice expectations and their behavioral intentions toward the change. Drawing on research from organizational justice and from construal level theory, we hypothesize that informational distance, i.e., the extent to which employees feel knowledgeable about the coming change, affects the relative influence of the anticipatory justice facets and anticipatory overall justice in predicting support for change. Consistent with the hypotheses, results from participants of a merger suggest that when employees feel less knowledgeable about the future change (high-informational distance), overall anticipatory justice predicts their intention to cooperate with the change. However, when employees feel more knowledgeable about the future change (low-informational distance), anticipatory justice facets predict intention to cooperate. Implications for research on organizational justice and change as well as considerations for practice are discussed.

show abstract

“…There also seem to be differential memory effects. Cojuharenco and Patient (2013) found that recall of fair events produced a greater emphasis on distributive justice, whereas recall of unfair events produced greater emphasis on interactional justice.…”

Section: Just Versus Unjust Conduct Within Organizational Justicementioning

confidence: 99%

Beyond the Particular and Universal: Dependence, Independence, and Interdependence of Context, Justice, and Ethics

et al. 2015

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article reflects on context effects in the study of behavioral ethics and organizational justice. After a general overview, we review three key challenges confronting research in these two domains. First, we consider social scientific versus normative approaches to inquiry. The former aims for a scientific description, while the latter aims to provide prescriptive advice for moral conduct. We argue that the social scientific view can be enriched by considering normative paradigms. The next challenge we consider, involves the duality of morally upright versus morally inappropriate behavior. We observe that there is a long tradition of categorizing behavior dichotomously (e.g., good vs. bad) rather than continuously. We conclude by observing that more research is needed to compare the dichotomous versus continuous perspectives. Third, we examine the role of ''cold'' cognitions and ''hot'' affect in making judgments of ethicality. Historically speaking, research has empathized cognition, though recent work has begun to add greater balance to affective reactions. We argue that both cognition and affect are important, but more research is needed to determine how they work together. After considering these three challenges, we then turn to our special issue, providing short reviews of each contribution and how they help in better addressing the three challenges we have identified.

show abstract

Workplace fairness versus unfairness: Examining the differential salience of facets of organizational justice

Cited by 28 publications

References 76 publications

Getting to the “COR”

Getting to the “COR”

Will I Cooperate? The Moderating Role of Informational Distance on Justice Reasoning

Beyond the Particular and Universal: Dependence, Independence, and Interdependence of Context, Justice, and Ethics

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About