2006
DOI: 10.1177/1368430206068431
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Workplace Diversity and Group Relations: An Overview

Abstract: Nutzungsbedingungen

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
47
0
10

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
47
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…This can also create gaps in individual and managerial participation in diversity, which ultimately can cause problems in the social foundation of the organization (Schneider and Northcraft, 1999). This effect is not consistent as significant amounts of other research has determined that social identity diversity can cause positive effects in teams as well as negative effects if well-managed, implying that leadership plays a moderating role in social identity diversity relationships (Christian, Porter and Moffitt, 2006;Horwitz, 2005).…”
Section: Social Organization Perspectivementioning
confidence: 41%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…This can also create gaps in individual and managerial participation in diversity, which ultimately can cause problems in the social foundation of the organization (Schneider and Northcraft, 1999). This effect is not consistent as significant amounts of other research has determined that social identity diversity can cause positive effects in teams as well as negative effects if well-managed, implying that leadership plays a moderating role in social identity diversity relationships (Christian, Porter and Moffitt, 2006;Horwitz, 2005).…”
Section: Social Organization Perspectivementioning
confidence: 41%
“…A majority of these diversity characteristic classifications are based on perception and are dichotomous in nature. Some of the classifications that can be identified in the literature include readily detectable/less observable, surface-level/deep-level, highly job-related/less jobrelated, task-related/relations-oriented, and role-related/ inherent dimensions (Christian, Porter and Moffitt, 2006). However, the majority of these classifications can be broken down into two perspectives, the information and decision making perspective and the social organization perspective (Christian, Porter and Moffitt, 2006).…”
Section: Classification Of Diversitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations