Diversity and Discrimination in Research Organizations 2022
DOI: 10.1108/978-1-80117-956-020221003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Workplace Bullying in Academia: Interaction of Gender, Nationality, Age, and Work Context of Scientific and Non-Scientific Employees in a Large German Research Organization

Abstract: Purpose: The study elaborates the contextual conditions of the academic workplace in which gender, age, and nationality considerably influence the likelihood of self-categorization as being affected by workplace bullying. Furthermore, the intersectionality of these sociodemographic characteristics is examined.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Workplace bullying and harassment have been identified as persistent problems in academia across geographical and national contexts (Conco et al, 2021;Meriläinen et al, 2019;Striebing, 2023) that reproduce inequalities within the academic workplace (Täuber et al, 2022). Online abuse extends and exacerbates these problems, given that it is often perpetrated by online strangers and members of the public who are not affiliated with the institutional community and therefore are not subject to its codes of conduct and antiharassment policies.…”
Section: Literature Review: Online Abuse Reproduces Systemic Inequalitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Workplace bullying and harassment have been identified as persistent problems in academia across geographical and national contexts (Conco et al, 2021;Meriläinen et al, 2019;Striebing, 2023) that reproduce inequalities within the academic workplace (Täuber et al, 2022). Online abuse extends and exacerbates these problems, given that it is often perpetrated by online strangers and members of the public who are not affiliated with the institutional community and therefore are not subject to its codes of conduct and antiharassment policies.…”
Section: Literature Review: Online Abuse Reproduces Systemic Inequalitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper, we follow Einarsen et al (2009), who distinguish between personal bullying, work-related bullying, and physically intimidating forms of bullying. Because bullying and workplace discrimination have a large amount of overlap, we occasionally use concepts from studies on workplace discrimination to inform our hypotheses (Striebing et al, 2023). The fundamental distinctions between the two are that bullying is a persistent behavior whereas discrimination can occur only occasionally, and that discrimination is based on primary identity characteristics while bullying victims might be diverse.…”
Section: Workplace Bullyingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The environment created by bullying thus defined can lead to reduced productivity (Lampman et al, 2016;Cassell, 2011;Fogg, 2008), physical symptoms including both mental and physical health symptoms (Cassell, 2011;Keim and McDermott, 2010;Lampman et al, 2016), lawsuits and scandal (Cassell, 2011;Lampman, 2012), and attrition from the university (Faria, Mixon, and Salter, 2012). Research shows that in academia, targets of academic bullying are disproportionally members of underrepresented identities (Striebing, 2022a(Striebing, , 2022c, including women (Lampman, 2012;Schraudner, Striebing, and Hochfeld, 2019), persons of color (Lampman, 2012), sexual minorities (Misawa, 2015), and persons with disabilities (Leymann, 1993, as cited in Hecker, 2007.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%