2000
DOI: 10.1001/archpedi.154.11.1127
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Working With Families of Suddenly and Critically Ill Children

Abstract: To describe physicians' experiences in attempting to provide optimal care for families of children who suffer from sudden, acute life-threatening conditions (SALTC).Design: To generate descriptive data in this exploratory study, we used qualitative methods including focus groups and in-depth interviews. Transcripts of focus groups and interviews were analyzed for content using standard phenomenologic analysis methods, which resulted in a participant-generated conceptual model of optimal care for families of ch… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
79
0
4

Year Published

2000
2000
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
79
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Most of them also find it helpful to share in decisions to withhold or withdraw lifesustaining treatment (LST), decisions that often precede a child's death. 2,3,5,9,11,[16][17][18][19][20] Parents' perception of a shared approach may even lower their grief in the long term. 21 The extent to which parents want to share in the decision-making process differs from parent to parent.…”
Section: What This Study Addsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of them also find it helpful to share in decisions to withhold or withdraw lifesustaining treatment (LST), decisions that often precede a child's death. 2,3,5,9,11,[16][17][18][19][20] Parents' perception of a shared approach may even lower their grief in the long term. 21 The extent to which parents want to share in the decision-making process differs from parent to parent.…”
Section: What This Study Addsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10,[16][17][18][19][20] Inconsistent caregivers, poor communication, and mistrust can contribute to conflict between providers and patients' families and to regret. 18,[21][22][23][24] However, provider continuity is unrealistic in intensive care settings because of the involvement of multiple professions and the 24/7 nature of the work. Good relationships between providers and patients' parents are essential during critical illness, when treatment decisions are complex, the environment is chaotic and unfamiliar, and outcomes are uncertain.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…35 More often than not, this requires time, a longer time than the medical staff can offer, as well as a larger capacity than the ICU allows. 36 It is known that patients designated as DNR or WD/WHLS have a longer PICU length of stay. 30,37 DNRs were written on average 6.9 days after patients were included in our study.…”
Section: The Decision-making Processmentioning
confidence: 99%