Working with Dissociative Identity Disorder Using Transactional Analysis

Hudson, Simon

doi:10.1177/036215370003000110

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 6 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Among the case studies, treatment was the most prevalent topic (Bull, 2001;Curley and Zamudio, 2009;Ellison et al, 2000;Gold et al, 2001;Hudson, 2000;Humphreys et al, 2005;Kellett, 2005;Krakauer, 2009;Lakshmanan et al, 2010;Okugawa et al, 2005), followed by forensic analysis (Lin et al, 2007;Uchinuma and Sekine, 2000), physiological processes (Savitz et al, 2004;Sheehan et al, 2006;Williams et al, 2003), and clinical features (Alao et al, 2000;Fishbain et al, 2001;Jacome, 2001). DID was incidental to the main point of two cases (Ginsberg and Sussman, 2001;Yücel et al, 2000).…”

Section: Research Topicsmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Review of Published Research on Adult Dissociative Identity Disorder

Boysen

VanBergen

2013

Journal of Nervous &Amp; Mental Disease

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The purpose of this study was to assess the scientific and etiological status of dissociative identity disorder (DID) by examining cases published from 2000 to 2010. In terms of scientific status, DID is a small but ongoing field of study. The review yielded 21 case studies and 80 empirical studies, presenting data on 1171 new cases of DID. A mean of 9 articles, each containing a mean of 17 new cases of DID, emerged each year. In terms of etiological status, many of the central criticisms of the disorder's validity remain unaddressed. Most cases of DID emerged from a small number of countries and clinicians. In addition, documented cases occurring outside treatment were almost nonexistent. Finally, people simulating DID in the laboratory were mostly indistinguishable from individuals with DID. Overall, DID is still a topic of study, but the research lacks the productivity and focus needed to resolve ongoing controversies surrounding the disorder.

show abstract