2018
DOI: 10.1787/9789264085350-en
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Working Together for Local Integration of Migrants and Refugees

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
21
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…According to the INSEE, 90% of migrants having arrived in the country in the past five years live in large urban areas (Brutel, 2016). The geographic localisation of recently arrived migrants follows the existing distribution, as areas which received the first migration inflows remained the main destinations for incoming migration arrivals (Noiriel, 2002;Safi, 2009). According to the national statistics institute (INSEE), the concentration of migrants is higher than the one of non-migrants: while nine out of ten migrants live in urban areas spaces, this is the case for eight out of ten non-migrants (Safi, 2009;Diaz-Ramirez, Liebig, Thoreau and Veneri, 2018).…”
Section: The Urban Area Of Paris As a Migration Hubmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the INSEE, 90% of migrants having arrived in the country in the past five years live in large urban areas (Brutel, 2016). The geographic localisation of recently arrived migrants follows the existing distribution, as areas which received the first migration inflows remained the main destinations for incoming migration arrivals (Noiriel, 2002;Safi, 2009). According to the national statistics institute (INSEE), the concentration of migrants is higher than the one of non-migrants: while nine out of ten migrants live in urban areas spaces, this is the case for eight out of ten non-migrants (Safi, 2009;Diaz-Ramirez, Liebig, Thoreau and Veneri, 2018).…”
Section: The Urban Area Of Paris As a Migration Hubmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the same time, due to their ephemeral character, such experiments do not fit the requirements which public plans and programmes usually need to meet in order to benefit from available financial support. The Fertilia experiment also highlights the fact that changes which are undergone by non-codified policies and planning practices are often disregarded by public institutions, which prefer to stay outside of generative actions, so as to maintain the status quo and follow the flows of funding, rather than make change possible and remove the structural causes of marginalisation and vulnerability (Monno and Serreli 2018). Under these conditions, emergent networks and cultures of governance may lack the necessary strength for supporting the formation of durable ties of cooperation between local citizens and migrants which are needed in order to revitalize places like Fertilia (Fig.…”
Section: Reflecting On Experiencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is corroborated by research by the European Commission and the OECD, which identifies the need to holistically integrate refugees and other migrants into society as early and rapidly as possible. 24 THE VULNERABILITY OF UNACCOMPANIED CHILDREN Children leave the reception centres for various reasons, but particularly because the system has failed them. They often attempt to cross the border because their rights are not being respected, and regulations are not properly implemented.…”
Section: Why the Reception System Fails Peoplementioning
confidence: 99%