2011
DOI: 10.3109/07420528.2011.565896
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Working on Sundays–Effects on Safety, Health, and Work-life Balance

Abstract: Several attributes of the work schedule can increase the risk of occupational injuries and accidents, health impairments, and reduced social participation. Although previous studies mainly focused on the effects of shiftwork and long working hours on employee health and safety, there is little evidence of a potential negative impact of working Sundays on the incidence of occupational accidents, health impairments, and work-life balance. A representative sample of employed workers in 31 member and associated st… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
36
0
3

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
3
36
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…That is, when individuals are no longer exposed to workrelated demands, such as during leisure Saturdays and/or leisure Sundays, psychobiological systems may stabilise again at baseline level, leading to recovery (Meijman and Mulder 1998;Sonnentag 2001). Leisure Sundays seem to be important for recovery from work demands: work on Sundays at least once a month has been shown to be associated with reported health impairments (Wirtz et al 2011). It is unclear whether working on Saturdays imposes a comparable risk.…”
Section: Recovery and Sleepmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…That is, when individuals are no longer exposed to workrelated demands, such as during leisure Saturdays and/or leisure Sundays, psychobiological systems may stabilise again at baseline level, leading to recovery (Meijman and Mulder 1998;Sonnentag 2001). Leisure Sundays seem to be important for recovery from work demands: work on Sundays at least once a month has been shown to be associated with reported health impairments (Wirtz et al 2011). It is unclear whether working on Saturdays imposes a comparable risk.…”
Section: Recovery and Sleepmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The prevalence of weekend work in Korean employees was higher than that reported for European workers, although there is a 6-year gap between the two surveys. In a study based on the 2005 European Working Conditions Survey, around half of all workers (49%) had worked at least one weekend day in the last month (Wirtz et al, 2011). In most Western countries, the amount of hours spent working has reduced since the Second World War, from approximately 2600 h per year prior to the war to 1400-1800 h per year in the 2000s and a 5-day workweek with 7-8 h of work per day is now traditional (Zeytinoglu & Cooke, 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this regard, gender could be an important confounding factor for an association between weekend work and depressive symptoms. Being female is a well-known risk factor for depression and female workers are most vulnerable to work-life imbalance, although the prevalence of weekend work is lower among female workers than among male workers (Wirtz et al, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The short-term effects of shiftwork and long working hours are well known and are related to sleep problems, fatigue, work-life balance, work performance, and occupational injuries and accidents Härmä, 2006;Hobbs et al, 2010;Ohayon et al, 2010;Riedel et al, 2010;Wirtz et al, 2011). In the long run, shiftwork has been associated with increased risk of obesity (Di Milia & Mummery, 2009), breast cancer Pesch et al, 2010), cardiovascular disease (CVD; Puttonen et al, 2010), gastrointestinal disorders (Knutsson & Boggild, 2010), and possibly elevated mortality risk (Chen et al, 2010;Lo et al, 2010;Tanaka et al, 2010;Zhu et al, 2011), although it is debatable whether shiftwork, itself, is an independent risk factor for poor health (Frost et al, 2009;Stevens et al, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%