2015
DOI: 10.3758/s13421-015-0526-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Working memory’s workload capacity

Abstract: We examined the role of dual-task interference in working memory using a novel dual two-back task that requires a redundant-target response (i.e., a response that neither the auditory nor the visual stimulus occurred two back versus a response that one or both occurred two back) on every trial. Comparisons with performance on single two-back trials (i.e., with only auditory or only visual stimuli) showed that dual-task demands reduced both speed and accuracy. Our task design enabled a novel application of Town… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
0
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We were also unable to meaningfully calculate post‐error accuracy adjustments, or to compare the traditional and robust methods of measuring post‐error slowing (see Williams, Heathcote, Nesbitt, & Eidels, ) because of the lack of errors. We therefore introduced a second decision in Experiment 2 to add cognitive load and therefore increase the number of errors (Heathcote et al, ; Strayer & Johnston, ). We hoped this would allow post‐error accuracy adjustments and additional post‐error slowing measures to be meaningfully calculated.…”
Section: Interim Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We were also unable to meaningfully calculate post‐error accuracy adjustments, or to compare the traditional and robust methods of measuring post‐error slowing (see Williams, Heathcote, Nesbitt, & Eidels, ) because of the lack of errors. We therefore introduced a second decision in Experiment 2 to add cognitive load and therefore increase the number of errors (Heathcote et al, ; Strayer & Johnston, ). We hoped this would allow post‐error accuracy adjustments and additional post‐error slowing measures to be meaningfully calculated.…”
Section: Interim Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, in the current study, we compared HRV in two different groups: In a group in which participants had to engage in a cognitively demanding bimodal 2-back task (i.e. Gatekeeper task group [27,28]; and a Documentary-viewing group in which participants watched emotionally neutral documentary films without any specific task. The 2-back task chosen was the recently developed Gatekeeper task [27,28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Participants in the fatigue group performed an adapted version of the gatekeeper task (Heathcote et al, 2014(Heathcote et al, , 2015 which is a dual 2-back task with visual and auditory stimuli.…”
Section: Fatigue Group -Gatekeeper Taskmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, in the current study, we compared the HRV functions in two different groups: a group in which participants have to engage in a cognitively demanding task (i.e. a bimodal 2back task; Heathcote et al, 2015;Heathcote et al, 2014) and a non-fatigue group in which participants watch documentary films. In the fatigue group, we hypothesized an increasing HRV (i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%