2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2007.09.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Working memory load–related electroencephalographic parameters can differentiate progressive from stable mild cognitive impairment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

14
125
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 141 publications
(140 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
14
125
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These maps confirm that cost-efficient configuration of individual nodes in the ␤-band network is strongly associated with task performance. Moreover, the spatial distribution of performance-critical nodes in the ␤-band map is concentrated over left temporal and parietal areas, and midline frontal areas, that have been implicated in many previous electrophysiological studies of similar tasks (14,16,17). These foci of association between accuracy and max(CE) of nodes in the ␤-band network remained significant even after controlling for multiple tests with a false-discovery rate correction (FDR) of 5%.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These maps confirm that cost-efficient configuration of individual nodes in the ␤-band network is strongly associated with task performance. Moreover, the spatial distribution of performance-critical nodes in the ␤-band map is concentrated over left temporal and parietal areas, and midline frontal areas, that have been implicated in many previous electrophysiological studies of similar tasks (14,16,17). These foci of association between accuracy and max(CE) of nodes in the ␤-band network remained significant even after controlling for multiple tests with a false-discovery rate correction (FDR) of 5%.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…More specifically, based on several studies linking N-back working memory performance to high-frequency (␤-band, 15-30 Hz, and ␥-band, 30-60 Hz) brain dynamics (14,15), especially in parietal (14,16) and frontal cortex (17), we expected that cost efficiency of high-frequency networks should be particularly critical to accuracy of working-memory task performance.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Corresponding to the relationship between FM theta oscillations and the maintenance mechanism it was demonstrated that when theta activity during retention was reduced, performance decreased (Klimesch et al, 2006). In association with an increasing number of items held in WM FM theta amplitude was shown to be enhanced (for example Onton et al, 2005;Jensen and Tesche, 2002;Missonnier et al, 2007) which was found most consistently during the retention interval regardless of the type of information (verbal, visuospatial). Therefore, it was suggested that the observed FM theta activity could reflect top-down modulation which helps to maintain the activation of cortical representations of the object after it is no longer present (for review see Mitchell et al, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Several reports over the past decade described the potential diagnostic importance of electrophysiological markers of cognitive decline in patients with MCI and the preclinical stage of AD, as obtained by analysis of the electroencephalography-derived event-related potentials (ERPs) [20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29]. For example, the ERP P2, N2, and P3 components are recognized as effective electrophysiological indices in the early stage of MCI diagnosis [20][21][22][23], as MCI subjects have prolonged P2, N2, and P3 latencies, and reduced P3 amplitudes, compared to healthy elderly controls [20,[24][25][26]. Even specific to the MCI subgroups [e.g., amnestic MCI (aMCI)], these ERP components may also be useful for observing the differences in cognitive processes from those of the healthy elderly [20,24,27,28], and to distinguish the different MCI subtypes (e.g., aMCI versus nonaMCI) [29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the ERP P2, N2, and P3 components are recognized as effective electrophysiological indices in the early stage of MCI diagnosis [20][21][22][23], as MCI subjects have prolonged P2, N2, and P3 latencies, and reduced P3 amplitudes, compared to healthy elderly controls [20,[24][25][26]. Even specific to the MCI subgroups [e.g., amnestic MCI (aMCI)], these ERP components may also be useful for observing the differences in cognitive processes from those of the healthy elderly [20,24,27,28], and to distinguish the different MCI subtypes (e.g., aMCI versus nonaMCI) [29]. ERP components may thus be sensitive enough to identify elderly patients with early cognitive decline or disease progression to MCI and/or AD.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%