2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.12.063
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Working memory for social information: Chunking or domain-specific buffer?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
27
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
2
27
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The WM dysfunction in schizophrenia may not only be associated with the failure to recruit the frontoparietal system but also due to a conjoint failure to suppress the task-irrelevant DMN system. However, this proposed anti-correlation between the FPC and DMN needs to be further ascertained in social WM, because some recent findings suggest that social WM and classical WM may rely on different neural mechanisms Thornton and Conway, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The WM dysfunction in schizophrenia may not only be associated with the failure to recruit the frontoparietal system but also due to a conjoint failure to suppress the task-irrelevant DMN system. However, this proposed anti-correlation between the FPC and DMN needs to be further ascertained in social WM, because some recent findings suggest that social WM and classical WM may rely on different neural mechanisms Thornton and Conway, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The PTT intervention is innovative in using principles of learning and memory enhancement. More specifically, the PTT intervention uses mnemonic strategies that include an acronym, chunking, and homework reinforcement for teaching and recalling the PTT skills (Thornton & Conway, 2013). An acronym, by definition, is formed by the first letter of words or groups of words to form a new word.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such top-down attention mechanisms can facilitate visual attention for positive or arousing emotional stimuli [5]. Similar facilitation effects can be observed for the social information a face conveys, and executive functions were recently shown to be burdened less by social cues, pointing to a working memory unit for social information [9].…”
Section: Introduction and Conceptmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…Such top-down attention mechanisms can facilitate visual attention for positive or arousing emotional stimuli [5]. Similar facilitation effects can be observed for the social information a face conveys, and executive functions were recently shown to be burdened less by social cues, pointing to a working memory unit for social information [9].Clearly, gaze is another highly task-relevant cue. Friesen and Kingstone [10] have shown that people respond significantly faster to a target when gaze direction by a schematic face predicted the target location.…”
mentioning
confidence: 64%