2003
DOI: 10.1162/089892903322598094
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Working Memory for Complex Scenes: Age Differences in Frontal and Hippocampal Activations

Abstract: Abstract& Age differences in frontal and hippocampal activations in working memory were investigated during a maintenance and subsequent probe interval in an event-related fMRI design. Younger and older adults either viewed or maintained photographs of real-world scenes (extended visual or maintenance conditions) over a 4-sec interval before responding to a probe fragment from the studied picture. Behavioral accuracy was largely equivalent across age and conditions on the probe task, but underlying neural acti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

11
77
3

Year Published

2004
2004
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 131 publications
(92 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
11
77
3
Order By: Relevance
“…One recent study found progressively greater impairments across subjects from 30 to 90 years of age (Davis et al, 2003), whereas another reported a steady decrease across multiple measures of memory in healthy adults from age 20 forward (Park et al, 2003). Declines in memory from young adulthood to middle age have also been described previously for rats (Deupree et al, 1993;Granger et al, 1996;Oler and Markus, 1998;Ward et al, 1999;Meneses et al, 2004) and monkeys (Herndon et al, 1997;Sloane et al, 1997), suggesting that this effect could be a general feature of mammalian brain.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…One recent study found progressively greater impairments across subjects from 30 to 90 years of age (Davis et al, 2003), whereas another reported a steady decrease across multiple measures of memory in healthy adults from age 20 forward (Park et al, 2003). Declines in memory from young adulthood to middle age have also been described previously for rats (Deupree et al, 1993;Granger et al, 1996;Oler and Markus, 1998;Ward et al, 1999;Meneses et al, 2004) and monkeys (Herndon et al, 1997;Sloane et al, 1997), suggesting that this effect could be a general feature of mammalian brain.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…Indeed, several studies of patients with HC atrophy have reported scene‐specific deficits for both memory and perceptual tasks [Bird et al, 2008; Hartley et al, 2007; Lee et al, 2005a, 2005b; Mullally et al, 2012; but see Kim et al, 2011, 2015]. Functional neuroimaging studies have likewise found group‐level HC activation during scene discrimination [Aly et al, 2013; Lee et al, 2008], scene construction/imagining [Zeidman et al, 2015], and working memory [Lee and Rudebeck, 2010b; Park et al, 2003]. Studies applying multivariate analysis techniques have also found evidence that the HC contains activation patterns that are sensitive to scene‐related information [Bonnici et al, 2012; Liang et al, 2013; but see Diana et al, 2008].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Beyond the seminal work in both rats and non‐human primates—which identified HC cells attuned to allocentric location [O'Keefe and Nadel, 1978] and spatial view [Rolls, 1999]—recent models of human medial temporal lobe (MTL) function highlight the HC as an important structure for scene processing, via a proposed role in representing complex and conjunctive scene stimuli [Graham et al, 2010; Lee et al, 2012; Murray et al, 2007] and/or by contributions to viewpoint‐independent scene construction [Bird and Burgess, 2008; Maguire and Mullally, 2013; Zeidman et al, 2015]. These complex HC scene representations have been shown to support behavioural performance across a range of cognitive domains, including recognition memory [Bird et al, 2008; Taylor et al, 2007], short‐term memory [Hannula et al, 2006; Hartley et al, 2007], working memory [Lee and Rudebeck, 2010a, 2010b; Park et al, 2003], perceptual learning [Mundy et al, 2013], higher‐order perception [Aly et al, 2013; Barense et al, 2005, 2010; Kolarik et al, 2016; Lee et al, 2005b] and scene imagination [Hassabis et al, 2007]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the powerful behavioral results demonstrating the centrality of speed for cognition in older adults, it has been difficult to identify the neural analog of decreased speed with age. Up to this point, demyelination and decreases in dopamine receptors have been the primary neural candidates accounting for age-related declines in perceptual speed (5,11), but these accounts fail to explain why simple choice reaction time does not account for as much age-related variance in cognition as perceptual speed does (30). The present findings suggest that perceptual comparison times may be slower in older subjects due to functional dedifferentiation in high-level sensory cortex that results in more time needed to disambiguate similarities between visual stimuli.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For one thing, the functions performed by different areas of prefrontal cortex are poorly understood. It is therefore difficult to interpret the functional significance of bilateral prefrontal activation in elderly subjects (11)(12)(13). Does the additional activation reflect the recruitment of more neural resources that are functionally specialized for the task being performed (which does not imply dedifferentiation of function)?…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%