By using the eye-tracking method, the present study explores whether working memory capacity assessed via the second language (L2) reading span (L2WMC) as well as the operational span task (OSPAN) affects the processing of subject-extraction and object-extraction in Chinese-English bilinguals. Results showed that L2WMC has no effects on the grammatical judgement accuracies, the first fixation duration, gaze duration, go-past times and total fixation duration of the critical regions in whextractions. In contrast, OSPAN influences the first fixation duration and go-past times of the critical regions in wh-extractions. Specifically, in region 1, (e.g., Who do you think loved the comedian [region 1] with [region 2] all his heart [subject-extraction]? versus Who do you think the comedian loved [region 1] with [region 2] all his heart? [object-extraction]), participants with high OSPAN were much slower than those with low OSPAN in their first fixation duration in reading subject-extractions, whereas there were no differences between participants with different OSPANs in reading objectextractions. In region 2, participants with high OSPAN were much faster than those with low OSPAN in their go-past times of object-extractions. These results indicated that individual differences in OSPAN rather than in L2WMC more strongly affect processing of wh-extractions. Thus, OSPAN results to be more suitable to explore the influences of working memory while processing L2 sentences with complex syntax, at least for intermediate proficient bilinguals. Results of the study also provide further support for the Capacity Theory of Comprehension.
HighlightsWhat is already known about this topic?• Some studies suggest that working memory capacity (WMC) measured by reading span is not a determining factor in second language (L2) syntactic processing; • Other studies suggest that reading span can be a good predictor in L2 syntactic processing;• Findings concerning the role of WMC in L2 sentence processing are mixed.
What this paper adds?• Individual differences in operation span task (OSPAN) play a more important role during L2 syntactic processing than L2WMC; • This study employed the eye-movement method to explore whether WMC measured via both the L2WMC and OSPAN influences the processing of subject-and objectextractions in Chinese-English bilinguals for the first time; • The results offer further support for the Capacity Theory of Comprehension as the limited WMC in humans seems to influence both the online and offline sentence processing.
Implications for theory, policy and practiceOperation span task (OSPAN) can reduce the contribution of task-specific variations in WMC's measurement and are more likely to reflect the genuine WMC of participants. Study on the potential moderating effects of OSPAN on WM effects can help to examine the precise nature of WM's role in L2 sentence processing.WORKING MEMORY CAPACITY 421