2012
DOI: 10.1007/s10936-011-9197-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Working Memory Effects of Gap-Predictions in Normal Adults: An Event-Related Potentials Study

Abstract: The current study examined the relationship between verbal memory span and the latency with which a filler-gap dependency is constructed. A previous behavioral study found that low span listeners did not exhibit antecedent reactivation at gap sites in relative clauses, in comparison to high verbal memory span subjects (Roberts et al. in J Psycholinguist Res 36(2):175-188, 2007), which suggests that low span subjects are delayed at gap filling. This possibility was examined in the current study. Using an event-… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
19
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
2
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, individuals with low WM spans did not show a P600 to the disambiguating word in a complex sentence, whereas high-span individuals did (Vos & Friederici, 2003). When parsing sentences containing long-distance syntactic dependencies, low-span individuals were about 200 ms delayed, based on the longer latency of their P600 responses (Hestvik et al, 2012). However, although the N400 and P600 have both been associated with WM, the English sentence stimuli in our study were simple enough that they neither taxed WM nor revealed its variability.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, individuals with low WM spans did not show a P600 to the disambiguating word in a complex sentence, whereas high-span individuals did (Vos & Friederici, 2003). When parsing sentences containing long-distance syntactic dependencies, low-span individuals were about 200 ms delayed, based on the longer latency of their P600 responses (Hestvik et al, 2012). However, although the N400 and P600 have both been associated with WM, the English sentence stimuli in our study were simple enough that they neither taxed WM nor revealed its variability.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The median L2WMC of all the 46 participants was 67.5. Following the study of Hestvik, Bradley and Bradley () and also that of Roberts et al (), we assigned participants to a low L2WMC group if their span was less than or equal to the median of their L2 reading span, and to a high L2WMC group if their span was greater than the median. This resulted in 23 high‐span participants (mean = 77.83, SD = 8.34) and 23 low span participants (mean = 55.26, SD = 9.65).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The processing of filler-gap sentences in particular might be expected to draw on working memory because resolving the dependency between the filler and the gap requires connecting elements that are at some distance from each other. The role of working memory in the highly automatic syntactic parsing that occurs in monolingual adults is controversial (e.g., Hestvik, Bradley, & Bradley 2012;Kluender & Kutas, 1993;Müller, King, & Kutas, 1997;but cf. Caplan & Waters, 1999).…”
Section: Individual Differences: Working Memory and Proficiencymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The role of working memory in the highly automatic syntactic parsing that occurs in monolingual adults is controversial (e.g., Hestvik, Bradley, & Bradley ; Kluender & Kutas, ; Müller, King, & Kutas, ; but cf. Caplan & Waters, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%