2012
DOI: 10.1080/13554794.2011.588183
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Working memory and mental imagery in Cerebral Palsy: A single case investigation

Abstract: In this study we describe visuospatial working memory and visual mental imagery of a child with Cerebral Palsy. Beyond a moderate impairment of visuomotor integration skills, cognitive level and memory span, poor performance emerged in figures reconstruction, in memorizing matrix patterns and movements along a path. No such deficits were observed in recalling figures and their positions on a grid and learning groups of words using a visual imagery strategy. This case highlights that impaired action execution i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
(24 reference statements)
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The study comparing motor imagery accuracy (hand rotation task) in children with congenital hemiplegia [ 35 ] showed that children with an RHL were a little slower and less accurate in a hand rotation task compared to those with an LHL and that this deficit was also correlated with the functional level as measured by the Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales. Lastly, findings from a recent case study of a young boy with CP affecting the left side of his body provide evidence that children with CP have deficits in tasks involving visuospatial working memory and imagery ability [ 36 ] supporting the notion that visuospatial working memory is interconnected with the generation and maintenance of mental images [ 37 – 39 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The study comparing motor imagery accuracy (hand rotation task) in children with congenital hemiplegia [ 35 ] showed that children with an RHL were a little slower and less accurate in a hand rotation task compared to those with an LHL and that this deficit was also correlated with the functional level as measured by the Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales. Lastly, findings from a recent case study of a young boy with CP affecting the left side of his body provide evidence that children with CP have deficits in tasks involving visuospatial working memory and imagery ability [ 36 ] supporting the notion that visuospatial working memory is interconnected with the generation and maintenance of mental images [ 37 – 39 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Response time and accuracy measured the performance. The task has already been used to assess spatial memory in healthy adults (Iachini & Ruggiero, 2006;Ruotolo, van Der Ham, Iachini, & Postma, 2011;Ruotolo, van der Ham, Postma, Ruggiero, & Iachini, 2015), brain-damaged patients (Iachini et al, 2009b;Ruggiero et al, 2014), blind people (Iachini, Ruggiero, & Ruotolo, 2014b;Ruggiero et al, 2009Ruggiero et al, , 2012, children with Cerebral Palsy (Barca, Frascarelli, & Pezzulo, 2012;Barca, Pezzulo, & Castelli, 2010) and has proved its efficacy in inducing a specific involvement of spatial frames of reference. On the basis of the literature, we hypothesized a difficulty, in terms of lower accuracy and longer processing time, with both spatial judgments in younger children and older adults (Montefinese et al, 2014;Vasilyeva & Lourenco, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Our spatial task explicitly requires the encoding of distances (coordinate) or relations (categorical) with respect to the participant’s body (egocentric) or to an external object (allocentric). This kind of experimental paradigm has already been used to assess spatial memory in healthy adults (Iachini and Ruggiero 2006 ), brain damaged patients (Barca et al 2010 ; Ruggiero et al 2014 ), blind people (Ruggiero et al 2009a , 2012 ; Iachini et al 2014a ), children with cerebral palsy (Barca et al 2012 ), in a fMRI study (Committeri et al 2004 ), and has proved its efficacy in inducing a specific involvement of spatial frames of reference. In the current study, one group of participants was required to learn the position of three geometrical objects (“3D” condition), whereas another group learned the position of three 2-dimensional geometric figures (“2D” condition).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%