1972
DOI: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1972.tb01281.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Working for Group Pride in a Slipper Factory1

Abstract: In a manufacturing firm the management provides daily production goals for a number of small assembly lines, and reports daily performance scores to the workers. In the research reported here, employees were asked after each of 3 weeks what goal they privately preferred their team to have in the future. On two occasions measures also were made of their desire for group success and their views toward their team and its task. It was observed that managers and workers alike preferred very difficult group goals, t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

1980
1980
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Collective pride , often overlooked in research, describes pleasure taken in being associated with one's employer (Bouckaert, ). Unlike conceptualizations of pride in group performance (Berkowitz and Levy, ), group pride (Zander and Armstrong, ) or pride in group (Nadler, ) examined in contexts of achievement from team member contributions, collective pride results primarily from relationships or affiliation, such as gender, race, nationality or organizational memberships (Lea and Webley, ; Tracy and Robins, ). Employees take collective pride if an organization receives recognition in the outside world for being ‘important, meaningful, effective, and […] a worthwhile part of the community’ (Arnett, Lavarie and McLane, , p. 90).…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Collective pride , often overlooked in research, describes pleasure taken in being associated with one's employer (Bouckaert, ). Unlike conceptualizations of pride in group performance (Berkowitz and Levy, ), group pride (Zander and Armstrong, ) or pride in group (Nadler, ) examined in contexts of achievement from team member contributions, collective pride results primarily from relationships or affiliation, such as gender, race, nationality or organizational memberships (Lea and Webley, ; Tracy and Robins, ). Employees take collective pride if an organization receives recognition in the outside world for being ‘important, meaningful, effective, and […] a worthwhile part of the community’ (Arnett, Lavarie and McLane, , p. 90).…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, there have been no attempts to analyze this relationship between the emotional and the attitudinal facets of organizational pride, particularly not empirically. In the case of organizational pride, research primarily characterizes it as an attitude (Arnett et al , 2002; Mischkind, 1998; Zander and Armstrong, 1972).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, outcomes for other group members, or for the group as a whole, come to be perceived as one's own. Indeed, there is evidence that feedback regarding total group outcomes can have more impact on the individual than does feedback on his or her own performance (e.g., Zander & Armstrong, 1972).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%