2022
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-04680-3_7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Working During Covid-19 Lockdowns: Qualitative Study of the Psychological Adaptation of Nurses and Teleworkers During Pandemic Phases I and III

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This could be explained by circumstantial events in the data collection procedures, as the general population answered the protocol specifically during a confinement period (March–April 2021), whereas the recruitment concerning parents included confinement and non-confinement periods. Although caregivers of children were more prone to psychological burden during the pandemic [ 15 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 ], in this case, increasing multiple and time-consuming parental responsibilities may have ended up minimising their exposure to pandemic information and news content, thus acting as a protective factor against obsessive thinking about COVID-19. These findings point to a possible protective factor of family against stressors, as it could act as a distractor and buffer effect due to multitasking demands and social support.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This could be explained by circumstantial events in the data collection procedures, as the general population answered the protocol specifically during a confinement period (March–April 2021), whereas the recruitment concerning parents included confinement and non-confinement periods. Although caregivers of children were more prone to psychological burden during the pandemic [ 15 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 ], in this case, increasing multiple and time-consuming parental responsibilities may have ended up minimising their exposure to pandemic information and news content, thus acting as a protective factor against obsessive thinking about COVID-19. These findings point to a possible protective factor of family against stressors, as it could act as a distractor and buffer effect due to multitasking demands and social support.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although less-studied, parents or caregivers of children were also more prone to developing psychological problems during the COVID-19 pandemic [15], based on the fact that many families experienced multiple hardships during this crisis (e.g., job or income loss, home-schooling and disrupted routines, less social support, and caregiving burden) [22][23][24][25]. Consequently, some evidence points to increased levels of negative moods, higher parental conflict, psychological distress, and anxiety states, mainly associated with difficulties related to multiple obligations and conflicting responsibilities [22,26,27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The coronavirus disease (COVID-19) was first discovered in China (December 2019) but it was spread disseminated worldwide in a quick manner, reaching a global sociocultural differences in the pandemic's overall mental health impact (Antunes et al, 2020;Candeias et al, 2021;Morgado et al, 2021). Indeed, both internationally as well as in Portugal, some particular groups have been consistently identified to be at a greater risk for psychosocial vulnerability, namely: women, people on a lower socioeconomic status, discriminated communities, health professionals and other front-line workers, people with previous (mental) health conditions, or those having barriers towards access to healthcare (Dubey et al, 2020;Luo et al, 2020;Paulino et al, 2020;Pires et al, 2022;Vindegaard & Benros, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%