1982
DOI: 10.1080/02732173.1982.9981651
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Working couples and class identification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1984
1984
1986
1986

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 7 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We also exclude individuals not in the labor force (notably housewives) whose spouses have blue-collar or service jobs. The alternative, however, is the more questionable procedure of imputing a woman's class solely on the basis of her husband's occupation (Acker, 1973;Nock and Rossi, 1978;Berk and Kingston, 1982). While it may be argued that class is an attribute of a family rather than of an individual, there is no accepted convention of how to weight the economic roles of all family members.…”
Section: The Working Classmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also exclude individuals not in the labor force (notably housewives) whose spouses have blue-collar or service jobs. The alternative, however, is the more questionable procedure of imputing a woman's class solely on the basis of her husband's occupation (Acker, 1973;Nock and Rossi, 1978;Berk and Kingston, 1982). While it may be argued that class is an attribute of a family rather than of an individual, there is no accepted convention of how to weight the economic roles of all family members.…”
Section: The Working Classmentioning
confidence: 99%