Working conditions in the long‐term care sector: A comparative study of migrant and native workers in Austria and Sweden

Abstract

Increased demand for long‐term care (LTC) services alongside precarious working conditions has resulted in labour shortages in the LTC sector, which has led to an increasing share of workers of migrant origin filling these jobs. Previous research on migrant care workers has also highlighted the seeming gap in working conditions relative to native workers. However, lack of disaggregated data on migrant and native care workers, alongside single‐case studies, may have concealed potential disadvantages faced by certain groups and insufficiently accounted for differences in migration regimes and organisation of LTC sectors. To address these gaps, we carried out a comparative study on various working conditions of migrant and native LTC workers in Austria and Sweden. Using the international Nordcare survey on care sector working conditions, carried out in Austria in 2017 (n = 792) and in Sweden in 2015 (n = 708), we employed t‐tests and multivariate logistic regressions to compare the working conditions of migrant and native carers in home and residential care in each country. We found that worse working conditions in Sweden compared to Austria may be explained by differences in training requirements of the LTC workforce and the relatively large for‐profit private sector. Country of origin also plays a paramount role in the differences in working conditions experienced by migrants compared to native care workers, with non‐European migrants being more likely to face a number of precarious working conditions. Our findings highlight the need to continue addressing precarious working conditions across the sector, particularly during the COVID‐19 pandemic where poor working conditions have been linked to increased COVID‐related deaths in nursing homes. Our findings also emphasise the importance of policies that consider the various challenges experienced by different migrant groups in the LTC sector, who may particularly be at risk of presenteeism during the COVID‐19 pandemic.

Abuse and Wellbeing of Long-Term Care Workers in the COVID-19 Era: Evidence from the UK

“…Nevertheless, the dominance of verbal abuse observed in our study was also present in the pre-COVID era (see, for example, [19,53]). Our study findings showed a higher prevalence of abuse incidents among minority ethnic workers, perhaps explained by the lack of empowerment and deeply entrenched negative attitudes, including structural racism, towards minority workers [29,54]. As in other studies [19,21], we found significant differences in abuse experiences between care settings, with such incidents more common in residential care.…”

How much are we worth? Experiences of nursing assistants in Swedish nursing homes during the first wave of COVID‐19

“…In large cities as Stockholm, the foreignborn staff in some units is the dominant staff category. In other parts of the world, there are similar patterns in older people care (Hurtado et al, 2012;Simmons et al, 2021).…”

The 2020 Aged Care Workforce Census and Issues Arising for Residential Care Workforce Planning and Policy

“…These three groups should not be regarded as ‘migrant workers’ in the same way the term has been applied in extensive studies of care workers migrating from Eastern Europe to seek care work in Western Europe and from Latin America and other countries to the United States. For example, migrant care workers in many countries were covered in the early study by Redfoot and Houser (2005) and the recent work of Simmons, Rodrigues and Szebehely (2021) compares experiences in Austria and Sweden. Even in countries where those who migrate on a temporary basis may hope to stay, few are able to secure permanent residence rights of the kind formally provided in Australia's migration program.…”