Workforce retention in rural and remote Australia: determining the factors that influence length of practice

Abstract

Objectives: To ascertain which factors are most significant in a general practitioner's decision to stay in rural practice and whether these retention factors vary in importance according to the geographical location of the practice and GP characteristics. Design: National questionnaire survey. The method of paired comparisons was used to describe the relative importance of the retention items. Setting: Non‐metropolitan Australia, September 2001. Participants: A stratified sample of all rural GPs practising during April–June 2001. Main outcome measures: A rank ordering of factors influencing how long GPs stay in rural practice, and an index of their relative perceived importance. Results: Professional considerations — overwhelmingly, on‐call arrangements — are the most important factors determining GP retention in rural and remote areas. Rural doctors consistently ranked on‐call arrangements, professional support and variety of rural practice as the top three issues, followed by local availability of services and geographical attractiveness. Proximity to a city or large regional centre was the least important factor. Retention factors varied according to geographical location and GPs' age, sex, family status, length of time in the practice, and hospital duties. Conclusions: A broad, integrated rural retention strategy is required to address on‐call arrangements, provide professional support and ensure adequate time off for continuing medical education and recreation.

Why do men go to the doctor? Socio-demographic and lifestyle factors associated with healthcare utilisation among a cohort of Australian men

“…People living in rural areas have less choice of healthcare services available and they are more likely to have longer travel distances to attend these services mostly without access to public transport [50–52]. Medical workforce shortages in rural areas makes access to health services even more challenging [53]. Rural health services have to provide care to a more dispersed population than urban services while at the same time, are often smaller, less resourced and face additional expenses associated with distance [54].…”

Addressing the migration of health professionals: the role of working conditions and educational placements

“…Almost 25% of rural doctors in Saskatchewan were on call 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, though call intensity and number of patients seen was small, suggesting that long hours are not rewarded with adequate compensation [20]. Similar reasons for dissatisfaction have been documented for other provinces in Canada [21], and for other countries [22,23]. Other sources of dissatisfaction for rural doctors include insufficient access to urban amenities [24], lack of professional contact with colleagues, downsizing of hospital facilities and not enough opportunities to continue medical education [25].…”

Palliative care professional education via video conference builds confidence to deliver palliative care in rural and remote locations

“…Studies suggest that providing continuing education to local staff can improve rural palliative care [15,16] and reduce attrition rates in the rural workforce [17]. More importantly, rural practitioners value access to education and support as a means of enhancing the delivery of care in their communities [18].…”