2016
DOI: 10.1097/phh.0000000000000470
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Workforce Competencies in Syndromic Surveillance Practice at Local Health Departments

Abstract: Supplemental Digital Content is Available in the Text.This study provides an assessment of self-reported knowledge and skills in syndromic surveillance tasks to effectively target technical assistance to different levels of local health department need.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another survey found “considerable” gaps in public health workforce proficiencies in syndromic surveillance. 39 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another survey found “considerable” gaps in public health workforce proficiencies in syndromic surveillance. 39 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The NSSP CoP's approach to building syndromic surveillance capacity includes various activities that were developed on the basis of an analysis of issues and learning needs identified through needs assessments, surveys, and conversations with syndromic surveillance practitioners and stakeholders. [21][22][23][24] Capacity-building activities of the NSSP CoP are grouped into 5 domains: (1) community-driven leadership, (2) member participation and engagement, (3) collaboration and networking, (4) knowledge sharing and training, and 5problem solving. ISDS uses a combination of quantitative (website usage metrics, member surveys) and qualitative (success stories) data to monitor the community's capacitybuilding efforts and successes.…”
Section: Nssp Cop's Capacity-building Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The LHDs' use of surveillance system to monitor opioid-related events can better equip and well position them to play an active role in addressing the opioid crisis. However, LHDs may vary in their capacity to identifying events of public health importance, interpreting patterns shown by syndromic surveillance data, and collaborating with other community partners on the follow-up of detected cases or events 6. It is critical to assess the extent of LHDs' engagement in activities to address the opioid crisis and the influence of engaging in syndromic surveillance of such activities.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%