2011
DOI: 10.1037/h0094772
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Workforce capacity for reducing rural disparities in public mental health services for adults with severe mental illness.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
(66 reference statements)
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The current study is part of a larger 5-year, mixed-methods assessment of the impact of system reform on access and quality of care for low-income adults with serious mental illness (Kano, Willging, & Rylko-Bauer, 2009; Hough, Willging, Altschul, & Adelsheim, 2010; Semansky, Altschul, Sommerfeld, Hough, & Willging, 2009; Willging et al, 2009; Willging & Semansky, 2010). The study took place in three rural counties and three counties with metropolitan areas, each chosen for geographic and ethnic diversity.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The current study is part of a larger 5-year, mixed-methods assessment of the impact of system reform on access and quality of care for low-income adults with serious mental illness (Kano, Willging, & Rylko-Bauer, 2009; Hough, Willging, Altschul, & Adelsheim, 2010; Semansky, Altschul, Sommerfeld, Hough, & Willging, 2009; Willging et al, 2009; Willging & Semansky, 2010). The study took place in three rural counties and three counties with metropolitan areas, each chosen for geographic and ethnic diversity.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wraparound services provided during the early transition period that emphasize harm reduction and treatment engagement may reduce these risks. Although the reentry needs of our participants closely resemble those of urban inmates (4, 5), the needs of rural women often remain unmet because of insufficient mental health care and social service delivery in rural areas (3). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Eligible for inclusion were women in the general prisoner population who were scheduled for release within six months to micropolitan counties (<50,000 residents) and noncore counties (<10,000 residents). Both types of counties are regarded as rural (3). Inmates were selected consecutively from lists generated by prison officials until we achieved approximately equal numbers of Hispanic, Native American, and White women.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Eligible for the purposive cross-sectional inmate sample were women in the general population scheduled for release within 6 months to micropolitan counties having no urbanized areas and 10,000–50,000 persons, and “non-core” counties with fewer than 10,000 persons. Both types of counties are regarded as rural (Hough, Willging, Altschul, & Adelsheim, 2011). The 99 inmates were selected consecutively from lists generated by prison officials until we achieved approximately equal numbers of Hispanic, Native American, and White women.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%