WorkflowDSL: Scalable Workflow Execution with Provenance for Data Analysis Applications

Fernando, Tharidu; Gureev, Nikita; Matskin, Mihhail; Zwick, Michael; Natschläger, Thomas

doi:10.1109/compsac.2018.00115

Cited by 5 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 10 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Tharido et al, 2018 [53] developed a DSL called "Work-flowDSL" for Data Analysis applications. WorkflowDSL language does not have a support for cyclic operations.…”

Section: Limitations Of Dsls For Workflowsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Domain-Specific Languages for Workflows.A Systematic Literature Review

Khan¹

2021

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper aims to provide an overview of the complete process in the development of a Domain-Specific Language (DSL). It explains the construction steps such as preliminary research, language implementation, and evaluation. Moreover, it provides details for different key components which are commonly found in the DSLs such as the abstraction layer, DSL metamodel, and the applications. It also explains the general limitations related to the Domain-Specific Languages for Workflows.

show abstract

“…Tharido et al, 2018 [53] developed a DSL called "Work-flowDSL" for Data Analysis applications. WorkflowDSL language does not have a support for cyclic operations.…”

Section: Limitations Of Dsls For Workflowsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Domain-Specific Languages for Workflows.A Systematic Literature Review

Khan¹

2021

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The literature reports languages used to describe bioinformatics workflows, e.g., Domain-Specific Languages (DSLs) can be tailored to bioinformatics [5]. UML has been adapted for bioinformatics processes (e.g., [19]).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Modeling Approach for Bioinformatics Workflows

Figueroa

Salman

Horkoff

et al. 2019

Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Bioinformaticians execute frequent, complex, manual and semi-scripted workflows to process data. There are many tools to manage and conduct these workflows, but there is no domain-specific way to textually and diagrammatically document them. Consequently, we create methods for modeling bioinformatics workflows. Specifically, we extend the Unified Modeling Language (UML) Activity Diagram to the bioinformatics domain by including domain-specific concepts and notations. Additionally, a template was created to document the same concepts in a text format. A design science methodology was followed, where four iterations with seven domain experts tailored the artefacts, extending concepts and improving usability, terminology, and notations. The UML extension received a positive evaluation from bioinformaticians. However, the written template was rejected due to the amount of text and complexity.

show abstract