51st AIAA/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference 2015
DOI: 10.2514/6.2015-4129
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Workflow Optimization of Multistage Axial Turbine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The absolute error was characterized by mean square error qMSE (3). The relative errors in determining the profile loss coefficient ζ pr and the efficiency of the cascade η PR were characterized by the mean relative square errors ‫ܧܵܯݍ‬ (ߞ ோ ) (4) and ‫ܧܵܯݍ‬ (ߟ ୖ ) (5) [11]:…”
Section: Investigation Of the Influence Of Parameters Of Finite Volummentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The absolute error was characterized by mean square error qMSE (3). The relative errors in determining the profile loss coefficient ζ pr and the efficiency of the cascade η PR were characterized by the mean relative square errors ‫ܧܵܯݍ‬ (ߞ ோ ) (4) and ‫ܧܵܯݍ‬ (ߟ ୖ ) (5) [11]:…”
Section: Investigation Of the Influence Of Parameters Of Finite Volummentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their use, although it is associated with a significant expenditure of time and computing resources, however, makes it possible to determine the characteristics of turbines without experiment with high reliability (with respect to other calculation methods) [4]. In addition, the application of numerical simulation makes it possible to widely use methods of mathematical optimization during the development of turbines [5]. Due to the complexity of the configuration of the blades and other elements of the turbine flow part, their optimization is associated with the variation of many parameters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation