2017
DOI: 10.1007/s10586-017-0786-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Workflow management system based on WEB technology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 8 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Among these applications, workflow is one the most important types especially when plenty of as computational devices, data, applications, and scientific instruments are involved and need to be orchestrated (Wu et al, 2015;Xiao and Hao, 2016;Casas et al, 2017). Imposing the workflow paradigm for application composition offers several advantages, including orchestrated resource sharing, optimised resource utilisation, automatic data processing, inter-organisational collaboration and so on (Zhao et al, 2015;Qi, 2017). Therefore, scientific communities, such as high-energy physics, bioinformatics, geophysics, etc., have widely applied workflow to perform complex simulations or process large volumes of datasets (Le-Blanc et al, 2013;Krieger et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among these applications, workflow is one the most important types especially when plenty of as computational devices, data, applications, and scientific instruments are involved and need to be orchestrated (Wu et al, 2015;Xiao and Hao, 2016;Casas et al, 2017). Imposing the workflow paradigm for application composition offers several advantages, including orchestrated resource sharing, optimised resource utilisation, automatic data processing, inter-organisational collaboration and so on (Zhao et al, 2015;Qi, 2017). Therefore, scientific communities, such as high-energy physics, bioinformatics, geophysics, etc., have widely applied workflow to perform complex simulations or process large volumes of datasets (Le-Blanc et al, 2013;Krieger et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%