Design Process Improvement 2005
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-84628-061-0_16
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Workflow for design

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, further steps are necessary for this examination of approval. To provide all relevant information, the individual method blocks should include detailed description following Vajna (2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, further steps are necessary for this examination of approval. To provide all relevant information, the individual method blocks should include detailed description following Vajna (2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, we extended the investigation to the arrangement or sequence of the blocks. In the literature, different ways of arranging process steps or activities in product development can be found (Blessing, 1994;Vajna, 2005): sequential / serial; iterative / cyclical; parallel / simultaneous or congruent. When transferring this basic idea to the blocks, it becomes apparent that the core difference between methods is the arrangement of the blocks used.…”
Section: Block Arrangementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research suggests that workflow design is based on the structure and characteristics of the product [39,40]. These premises prompted Reijers et al to offer a method referred to as product-based workflow design (PBWD) [41].…”
Section: Workflow Design (Wfd)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, deliverables in ED processes are virtual and not always well defined. These range from data, information, product specifications, concepts, ideas, designs, to trials (and errors) (Vajna, 2005;Helten, 2015). Thus, the outputs of many PD activities cannot be verified until much later (Browning et al, 2006, p. 11).…”
Section: Product Development and Engineering Design Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%