2011
DOI: 10.1080/10510974.2010.551314
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Workers' Moral Mum Effect: On Facework and Unethical Behavior in the Workplace

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
47
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
4
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, we intend to test the effects of personality traits of individuals on their intention formation under hypothetical conditions of substantial social pressure. When a subordinate is faced with an unethical request, non-compliance might lead to threatening actions (Bisel, Kelley, Ploeger, & Messersmith, 2011). In the face of threats, the subordinate may cognitively restructure the request to minimize the ethical content (cf.…”
Section: Personality Traitsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, we intend to test the effects of personality traits of individuals on their intention formation under hypothetical conditions of substantial social pressure. When a subordinate is faced with an unethical request, non-compliance might lead to threatening actions (Bisel, Kelley, Ploeger, & Messersmith, 2011). In the face of threats, the subordinate may cognitively restructure the request to minimize the ethical content (cf.…”
Section: Personality Traitsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many of these workers drew upon the identities invited by the organizational hierarchy to make sense of their communication strategy of silence. These findings provide further evidence that relational dynamics codified in hierarchies alter workplace messaging-at times, in ways that are ultimately detrimental to individuals and collectives alike (Bisel, Kelley, Ploeger, & Messersmith, 2011;Kassing, 2006;.…”
Section: Hierarchiesmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…The mum effect was further studied by Bisel, Kelley, Ploeger, and Messersmith (2011) in an examination of research participants' willingness to justify, or deny, making immoral decisions in the workplace. In their study, Bisel et al presented subordinates and supervisors with morally questionable scenarios.…”
Section: Moral Mum Effectmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Workplace bullying, over an extended period of time, negatively affects the subordinate's relationship with the supervisor (Glasø, Nielsen, & Einarsen, 2009;MacIntosh, 2005), harms teamwork (Baillien, Neyens, DeWitte, & De Cuyper, 2009;Gardner & Johnson, 2001), reduces morale, reduced creativity, lower productivity (Baruch, 2005;Bilgel, Aytac, & Bayram, 2006;Hauge, Skogstad et al, 2010;Namie, 2003;Quine, 2003), and decreases commitment to the organization (Gardner & Johnson), all of which have significant consequences to organizational culture. Bisel et al (2011) in stating "females, younger workers, and those with the least work experience are most indirect in denying an unethical request," demonstrate an interesting caveat (p. 465). Older subordinates, with more work experience, may be more likely to possess the workplace self-identity and self-esteem necessary to speak out against a tyrannical supervisor as would a junior subordinate with less work experience.…”
Section: Whistleblowingmentioning
confidence: 99%