Worker unrest and institutional change: Perceptions of local trade union leaders in China

Abstract

Worker protests in China are increasing in frequency, and workers are making more ambitious demands. However, it is unclear whether this activism is, on the whole, drawing a reformist or conservative response from officials. Using a 2014 survey of city-level leaders from China’s official trade union federation, we find that an acknowledgement of the seriousness of today’s labour disputes and of how the country’s industrial relations are changing is positively correlated with respondents’ optimism regarding the likelihood of changes to China’s political system. To determine exactly what this means ideologically, we further compare reform optimists and pessimists with regard to their support for a range of more specific policies, finding that those who believe systemic changes are close at hand have different views from their peers regarding the importance of engagement with global civil society and a tripartite (government, union, employer) approach to managing workplaces. This provides tentative support for the idea that reform optimists are reform supporters and that interest in change among Chinese officials, at least at the level studied here, is growing alongside workplace conflict.

The influence of the labour market and COVID-19 on human resource practices in SMEs in China: a longitudinal study

“…In particular, they encourage organisations to develop new job competency models and network-based recruiting practices, predict training effectiveness, enhance implementations of appropriate performance appraisal systems and rely on government aid regulations and trade unions in determining compensation. It is noteworthy that the "All China Federation of Trade Unions" (ACFTU) and its branches are expanding their influence in private firms with the aim of easing the tensions in employment relations and enhancing collective bargaining (Wang, 2008;Wang and Elfstrom, 2017). There is, however, other evidence suggesting that ACFTU's collective voice function remains constrained (Yang et al, 2019).…”

The role of the state in influencing work conditions in China's internet industry: Policy, evidence, and implications for industrial relations

“…Meanwhile, researchers also are concerned about the role of the All-China Federation of Trade Unions (ACFTU) in promoting workers’ rights and defending workers’ interests (Chang and Brown, 2017; Chen, 2003; Taylor and Li, 2007; Wang and Elfstrom, 2016). However, they come to very different conclusions about its impact on China's industrial relations system.…”

Elite Selection in Single-Party Autocracies: Minimizing Protests and Counterproductive State Violence to Maintain Social Stability

“…Despite framing the demands as labor-related issues, the changing nature of labor strikes from defensive to offensive makes “strikes—one of the most politically sensitive topics in China” (Friedman 2014, 67). A growing labor shortage and new labor laws have incentivized workers to demand better workplace conditions, more respect from employers, and higher wages (Elfström and Kuruvilla 2014, Wang and Elfström 2017). Friedman (2014, 19) describes China’s labor strikes as a nationwide political movement: “when viewed in the aggregate [.…”

“…9 While All China Federation of Trade Unions (ACFTU) has, by design, been subordinate to the Party since the founding of the PRC, state control was further strengthened in response to the ACFTU leadership expressing sympathy for the 1989 protesters (Taylor and Li 2007, 703, Friedman 2014, 45–47). Furthermore, labor leaders tend to espouse democratic values and to believe in the necessity of political reform in the near future, demanding the separation of powers, and a greater popular participation in local politics (Wang and Elfström 2017, 85) and often make explicit political demands of holding the government accountable (Carter and Carter 2020, 1818). Systematic evidence from China corroborates this intuition: labor protests are more likely to occur on the anniversaries of brutally suppressed pro-democracy uprisings (Carter and Carter 2020).…”